ماهیت و موضوعات حقوقی کلیدی موافقت‌نامه پاریس در خصوص تغییرات اقلیمی

نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار گروه حقوق دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد

2 استادیار گروه مهندسی آب دانشگاه تربیت مدرس

3 دانش آموخته حقوق بین الملل دانشگاه شیراز

10.22034/jlr.2019.119597.1123

چکیده

تمایز قائل شدن میان قالب حقوقی و ساختار موافقت‌نامه پاریس در کل و محتوای خاصّ مقررات و عناصر فردی این سند حائز اهمیت است موافقت‌نامه پاریس طبق تعریف کنوانسیون وین در خصوص حقوق معاهدات یک معاهده است، اما همه مقررات این موافقت‌نامه تعهد حقوقی ایجاد نمی‌کند. موافقت‌نامه با پذیرش یک ساختار دوگانه، آمیزه‌ای از مقررات الزام‌آور و غیرالزام‌آور را در خود جای داده است. این موافقت‌نامه دربردارنده مجموعه‌ای از تعهدات سخت، نرم و موارد غیرتعهدآور است که مرز میان آن‌ها نامشخص است اما هریک از آن‌ها نقش متمایز و ارزشمندی را ایفا می‌کنند. این مقاله با روش دگماتیسم و به صورت توصیفی- تحلیلی، قالب حقوقی، قلمرو اجرایی و ساختار دوگانه بالا به پایین و پایین به بالا موافقت‌نامه پاریس را مورد بحث قرار می‌دهد و شاخصه‌های تعیین میزان الزام‌آوری مفاد اصلی موافقت‌نامه پاریس را شناسایی می‌نماید و آن‌ها را با تفکیک طیفی از تعهدات سخت، نرم و غیرتعهدآور که بیشترین تطابق را با آنها دارند ارائه می‌نماید.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Nature and Key Legal Issues of Paris Agreement on Climate Change

نویسندگان [English]

  • Azam Amini 1
  • Hojjat Mianabadi 2
  • Ehsan Daryadel 3
1 Assistant Professor of Public International Law Department of Law Faculty of law and political Science Ferdowsi University of Mashhad
2 Assistant professor, Water Engineering Departments, Tarbiat Modares University
3 MA of International Law, Shiraz University
چکیده [English]

Distinguishing between legal form and structure of the Paris Agreement, in general, and specific content of its provisions and individual elements is of great improtance.This agreement is a treaty within the meaning of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, although not all provisions in it produce legally binding obligation. Paris Agreement has included a compound of legally and non-legally binding provisions while having a twofold structure (button-up and top-down).This agreement contains a mix of hard, soft, and non-obligations, the boundaries between which are blurred, but each of which plays a distinct and valuable role. This article has discussed legal form, scope and button-up, top-down structure of Paris Agreement using a dogmatic-descriptive approach, identifies legal character of provisions in the Paris Agreement, and then proceeds to tabulate the core provisions of the Paris Agreement across a spectrum from those that conform most closely to hard obligations to those that are best characterized as ‘non-obligations.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • "Paris Agreement"
  • "Climate change"
  • "Legal Form"
  • "Hard Obligations"
  • "Soft Obligations"
 

 

فهرست منابع

الف-منابع فارسی

1-پاسرین إن تروز ، الکساندر.«حقوق طبیعی ، درآمدی برفلسلفۀ حقوق» ، ترجمۀ محمدحسین طالبی ،مجلۀ معرفت، شمارۀ 49 ، دی 1380.

2-طالبی ،محمد حسین .«نظریۀ حقوق طبیعی درفلسفۀ حقوق» ،مجلۀ معرفت، شمارۀ46 ،مهر1380 .

ب-منابع خارجی

                    Books

  1. Akashi, K. Cornelius van Bynkershoek: His Role in the History of International Law, The Hague, Kluwer, 1998.
  2. Aquinas, T. SUMMA THEOLOGIEA, in 2 Basic  Writings  of Saint  Thomas  Aquinas  I-I, question 95, art. 4 (Anton C. Pegis ed. & Laurence Shapcote, O.P. trans., Random House 1945) .
  3. Bello, A. The Principles of  International Law, 1832.
  4. Bourquin, M. “L’humanisation du droit des gens”, in La technique et les principes du Droit public public – Études en l’honneur de G. Scelle, vol. II, Paris, LGDJ, 1950,  vol. I, pp.
  5. Cançado Trindade, A.A. “A Emancipação do Ser Humano como Sujeito do Direito Internacional e os Limites da Razão de Estado”, 6/7 Revista da Faculdade de Direito da Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro(1998-1999) pp. 425-434,IN: Trindade,int,l law for Humankind…,ibid, p. 241.
  6. Cançado Trindade, A.A. “Co-existence and Co-ordination of Mechanisms of International Protection of Human Rights (At Global and Regional Levels”, 202 RCADI(1987) .
  7. Cançado Trindade. A.A. “International Law for Humankind: Towards a New us Gentium- General Course on Public International Law - Part I”, 316 Recueil des Cours de l’Académie de Droit International de la Haye [RCADI] (2005) .
  8. Cançado Trindade, A.A.  International Law for Humankind Towards a New Jus Gentium, MARTINUS NIJHOFF PUBLISHERS LEIDEN• BOSTON, 2010 .
  9. Cançado Trindade, A.A.  The Application of the Rule of Exhaustion of Local Remedies in International Law, Cambridge, University Press, 1983 .
  10. Cançado Trindade, A.A.  “The Procedural Capacity of the Individual as Subject of International Human Rights Law: Recent Developments”, in Les   droits de l’homme à l’aube du XXIe siècle – K. Vasak Amicorum Liber, Bruxelles, Bruylant, 1999.
  11. Chen, Ti-Chiang. The International Law of Recognition, London, Stevens, 1951 .
  12. Crawford, J.  The Creation of States in International Law, Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1979 .
  13. Friedmann, W.  The Changing Structure of International Law, London, Stevens, 1964.
  14. Gowlland-Debbas, V.  “Judicial Insights into Fundamental Values and Interests of the International Community”, in The International Court of Justice: Its Future Role after Fifty Years(eds. A.S. Muller et alii), The Hague, Kluwer, 1997.
  15. Guggenheim, P.  “Les principes de Droit international public”, 80 RCADI(1952) .
  16. Jessup, Ph.C.  A Modern Law of Nations – An Introduction, New York, MacMillan Co., 1948.
  17. Korovin, Y.A. S.B. Krylov, et alii, International Law, Moscow, Academy of Sciences of the USSR/Institute of State and Law, [s/d].
  18. Lauterpacht, H.  International Law and Human Rights, London, Stevens, 1950.
  19. Mandelstam, A.N.  Les droits internationaux de l’homme, Paris, Éds. Internationales, 1931.
  20. Marek, K.  Identity and Continuity of States in Public International Law, 2nd. ed., Geneva, Droz. 1968.
  21. McCoy, Charles  N. R.  The Problem of the Origin of Political Authority, in On the Inteligibility  of Political  Philosopphy :Essays   of Charles   N. R. McCoy ,James V. Schall & John J. Schrems eds.,1989.
  22. McCoy, Charles  N.R.  The Structure  of Political  Thought  ,1963.
  23. McNair, Lord Selected Papers and Bibliography, Leiden/N.Y., Nijthoff /Oceana, 1974.
  24. Parry, C.“Some Considerations upon the Protection of Individuals in International Law”, 90 RCADI(1956) .
  25. Politis, N.  Les nouvelles tendances du Droit international, Paris, Libr. Hachette, 1927.
  26. Radbruch, G.  Filosofia do Direito, vol. I, Coimbra, A. Amado Ed., 1961.
  27. Remec, P.P.  The Position of the Individual in International Law according to Grotius and Vattel, The Hague, Nijhoff, 1960.
  28. Röling, B.V.A.  International Law in an Expanded World, Amsterdam, Djambatan,1960.
  29. Ross, A. A Textbook of International Law – General Part, London, Longmans, 1947.
  30. Saito, Y.  “Judge Tanaka, Natural Law and the Principle of Equality”, in The Living Law of Nations – Essays in Memory of A. Grahl-Madsen(eds. G. Alfredsson and P. Macalister-Smith), Kehl/Strasbourg, N.P. Engel Publ., 1996.
  31. Scelle, G.  Précis de Droit des Gens – Principes et systématique, part I, Paris, Libr. Rec. Sirey, 1932 (CNRS reprint, 1984).
  32. Schall, James V.  "Man for Himself': On the Ironic Unities of Political Philosophy,POL. Sci. Reviewer , Fall 1985.
  33. Schall, James V. Truth, Liberty, and Law, in 1989 The Catholic  Commssion  on Intelectual  and Cultural  Affairs  59-74,See also Yves  R. Somon , Freedom of the Intellect and Truth and Community, in A General  Theory  of Authority(1980).
  34. Scott, J. Brown. The Spanish Origin of International Law – Francisco de Vitoria and his Law of Nations, Oxford/London, Clarendon Press/H. Milford – Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 1934.
  35. Serra, A. Truyol y. Noções Fundamentais de Direito Internacional Público, Coimbra, A. Amado Ed., 1962, pp. 141-143,IN: Cancado Trindade, International Law for Humankkind :Towards a New Jus Geitium ,Matinus Nighoff Publishers,Leiden.Boston,2010 .
  36. Sperduti, G. L’Individuo nel Diritto Internazionale, Milano, Giuffrè Ed., 1950.
37.Vattel, Emeric du. “The Law of Nations ;or Principles of the Law of Nature, Applied to the Conduct add Affairs of Nations and Sovereigns ”,Trans. Monsieur de VattelA , Sixtht American Edition , No.5, Minor Street.1844.

  38. Wolff, C.  Jus Gentium Methodo Scientifica Pertractatum(edition of 1764), vol. II, Oxford/ London, Clarendon Press/H. Milford – Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. The Law of Nations Treated According to the Scientific Method,Trans by Joseph H.Drake,1934 .

Articles

39. Cançado Trindade, A.A. “A Emancipação do Ser Humano como Sujeito do Direito Internacional e os Limites da Razão de Estado”, 6/7 Revista da Faculdade de Direito da Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro(1998-1999) . 

 

  1. Cançado Trindade, A.A.  “The International Law of Human Rights at the Dawn of the XXIst Century”, 3 Cursos Euromediterráneos Bancaja de Derecho Internacional – Castellón/Spain (1999) .
41.Cançado Trindade, A.A. “The Voluntarist Conception of International Law: A Re-Assessment”, 59 Revue de droit international de sciences diplomatiques et politiques– Geneva ,1981 .

42.Castberg, F.  “Natural Law and Human Rights”, 1 Revue des droits de l’homme/Human Rights Law Journal,1968.

43-Charney, J.I. “International Lawmaking – Article 38 of the ICJ Statute Reconsidered”, in New Trends in International Law making – International ‘Legislation’ in the Public Interest(Proceedings of the  Kiel Symposium, March 1996), Berlin, Duncker & Humblot, 1997.

44.Charney, J.I.  “Universal International Law”, 87 American Journal of International Law,1993.

45.Crawford, J.  “The Criteria for Statehood in International Law”, 48 British Year Book of International Law [BYBIL],1976-1977 .

46.De Visscher, Ch.  “Les droits fondamentaux de l’homme, base d’une restauration du Droit international – Rapport”, in Annuaire de l’Institut de Droit International ,1947.

47.Dominice, C. The Methodology of International Law ,Encyclopedia of Public International Law,1986 .

48.Ebbesson, J.  “The Notion of Public Participation in International Environmental Law”, 8 Yearbook of International Environmental Law,1997 .

49.Eisenmann, Ch.  “Une nouvelle conception du droit subjectif: la théorie de M. Jean Dabin”, 60 Revue du droit public et de la science politique en France et à l’étranger ,1954 .

50. Kelsen, H. “Recognition in International Law – Theoretical Observations”, 35 AJIL ,1941 .

51.Lauterpacht, H. “The Grotian Tradition in International Law”, 23 British Year Book of International Law ,1946 .

52.Lauterpacht, H . “The Law of Nations, the Law of Nature and the Rights of Man”, 29 Transactions of the Grotius Society ,1943 .

53.Meron, T.  “The Humanization of Humanitarian Law”, 94 American Journal of International Law [AJIL],2000 .

54.Mullerson, R.A.  “Human Rights and the Individual as Subject of International Law: A Soviet View”, 1 European Journal of International Law,1990 .

55.Schall, S.J. James V.”National Law and the Law of Nations: Some Theroritical Considerations ” , Fordham Intertional Law Journal,vol.15,1991-1992 .

56.Tammes, A.J.P.  “The Legal System as a Source of International Law”, 1 Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Internationaal Recht,1954 .

57.Wolfke, K.  “Some Persistent Controversies Regarding Customary International Law”, 24 Netherlands Yearbook of International Law,1993 .

Casees and Material

58.As it can be inferred, e.g., from the historical case of the “Street Children” (case Villagrán Morales and Others versus Guatemala) before the IACtHR (1999-2001), the international juridical subjectivity of the individuals is nowadays an irreversible reality, and the violation of their fundamental rights, emanated directly from the international legal order, brings about juridical consequences. 41-Set forth in Article 36(1) of the 1963 Vienna Convention on Consular Relations and linked to the guarantees of the due process of law under Article 8 of the American Convention on Human Rights.

59.ICJ,Rep. Advisory Opinion of the International Court of Justice on Reparations for Damages,1949 .

60.ICJ, Rep. Advisory Opinion of Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory,9 July 2004 .

61.Inter-American Court of Human Rights [IACtHR], Castillo Petruzzi and Others versus Perucase (Preliminary Objections) , Judgment of 04.09.1998, Series C, n. 41,Concurring Opinion of Judge A.A. Cançado Trindade.

62.Set forth in Article 36(1) of the 1963 Vienna Convention on Consular Relations and linked to the guarantees of the due process of law under Article 8 of the American Convention on Human Rights.