منابع و ماخذ
الف) مقالات
1_ Bean, B., and MacGuidwin, E. “Unscrewing The Inscrutable: The UK Bribery Act 2010”, Indiana International Comparative Law Review, 23:1, (2013): 63-109.
2_ Dalton, M. “Efficiency v. Morality: The Codification of Cultural Norms In The Foreign Corrupt Practice Act”, NYU Journal of Law And Business, 2, (2006): 583-639.
3_ David-Barrett, E. “Are Some Bribes More Harmful Than Others? Exploring The Ethics Behind Anti-Bribery Laws”, Journal of Interdisciplinary Economics, 26:1&2, (2014): 119-144.
4_ Doj & SEC. “A Resource Guide To The U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act”. (2012). Available At: http://www.sec.gov/spotlight/fcpa/fcpa-resource-guide.pdf.
5_ Hills, L. “Universal Anti-Bribery Legistlation Can Save International Business: A Comparison of The FCPA and UKBA in An Attempt To Create Universal Legislation To Combat Bribery Around The Globe”, Richmond Journal of Global Law & Business, 13:3, (2014): 469-492.
6_ Jordan, J. “Recent Developments In The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act And The New UK Bribery Act: A Global Trend Towards Greater Accountability In The Prevention of Foreign Bribery”, New York Journal of Law & Business, 7, (2011): 845-871.
7_ Leibold, A. “Extraterritorial Application of The FCPA Under International Law”, Willamette Law Review, 51:225, (2015): 225-268.
8_ Myint, U. “Corruption: Causes, Consequence And Cures”, Asia-Pacific Developement Journal, 7:2, (2000): 33-58.
10_ Pacini, C., Swingen, J., and Rogers, H. “The Role of OECD And EU Conventions In Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials”, Journal of Business Ethics, 37:4, (2002): 385-405.
11_ Park, A. “Keep Your Eye on The Bribe: Focusing FCPA Enforcement”, Journal of Law, Economics & Policy, 9:2, (2013): 305-324.
12_ Rachel, R. “The FCPA's Legacy: A Case For Imposing Aiding-And-Abetting Liability on Corporations Through An Amended Alien Tort Claims Act”, Texas International Law Journal, 49:1, (2014): 83-119.
13_ Richard, S. “To Bribe A Prince: Clarifying The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act Through Comparisons To The United Kingdom's Bribery Act of 2010”, Boston College International Comparative Law Review, 37:2, (2014): 419-450.
14_ Sequeira, S. “Displacing Corruption: Evidence From A Tariff Liberalization Program”, Working Paper. The London School of Economics and Political Sceince, (2013): 1-59.
15_ Shu Ying Wee, N. “The OECD Convention on Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials and The Impact of The United Kingdom's Bribery Act 2010 on Corporations: Is The Act Too Harsh?”, International Trade and Business Law Review, (2014): 126-198.
16_ Strauss, E. “Easing Out The FCPA Facilitation Payment Exception”. Boston University Law Review, 93:1, (2013): 235-273.
ب) کنوانسیونها، قوانین و مقررات
17_ Bribery Act
18_ Foreign Corrupt Practices Act.
19_ General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade.
20_ OECD Convention on Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials in International Business Transactions (OECD Anti-Bribery Convention)
ج) پروندهها
21_ SEC v. Braskem, S.A., No. 1: 16-cv-02488 (D.D.C. 2016)
22_ SEC v. Siemens Aktiengesellschaft, Civil Action No. 08 CV 02167 (D.D.C)
23_ United States v. BAE Systems PLC Court Docket Number: 10-CR-035-JDB
24_ United States v. Control Components, INC. Court Docket Number: 09-CR-162-JVC
25_United States v. Daimler AG Court Docket Number: 10-CR-063-RJL
26_ United States v. Hewlett-Packard Mexico, S. DE R.L. DE C.V.(2014)
27_ United States v. Hewlett-Packard Polska, SP. Z O.O.Court Docket Number: CR-14-202EJD
28_ United States v. JGC Corporation, Court Docket Number: 11-CR-260
29_ United States v. Kay, 200 F. Supp. 2d 681 (S.D. Tex. 2002)
30_ United States v. Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Court Docket Number: 08-CR-367-RJL
31_ United States v. ZAO Hewlett-Packard A.O.Court Docket Number: CR-14-201 DLJ
)