Shahid Beheshti University Legal Research Quarterly 1024-0772 25 attorney standards 2023 02 20 The Role of Supreme Court in Unification and Progress of Law concerning the Attorney at Law The Role of Supreme Court in Unification and Progress of Law concerning the Attorney at Law 67 94 103285 10.52547/jlr.2023.228126.2268 FA Hassan Mohseni University of Tehran, Faculty of Law & Political Science 0000-0001-5930-9035 Mahsa Aghaie PhD Candidate of Private Law University of Tehran Journal Article 2022 06 08 Between the years 1335 to 1398 (in Persian Calendar) , 10 Unification Judgments have been issued on the subject of Lawyers and Attorney at Laws, which can be classified into four categories according to the subjective dimensions of each. Examining these Unification Judgments shows the fact that they have had a significant impact on the issues surrounding Lawyers and Attorney at Laws in Iran's legal system and not only have removed legal gaps and ambiguities to an acceptable extent, but some of these judgments have guaranteed people's rights. Also, their access to the services of lawyers has been facilitated. Also, have had an impact on the material and moral rights related to the legal profession. Most of these judgments, which of course were issued correctly and in accordance with the law, have still preserved their credibility, but the credibility of two of them due to the change in the laws is questionable. This article shows the role of Supreme Court in the standardization of law of Lawyers and Attorney at Laws. Between the years 1335 to 1398 (in Persian Calendar) , 10 Unification Judgments have been issued on the subject of Lawyers and Attorney at Laws, which can be classified into four categories according to the subjective dimensions of each. Examining these Unification Judgments shows the fact that they have had a significant impact on the issues surrounding Lawyers and Attorney at Laws in Iran's legal system and not only have removed legal gaps and ambiguities to an acceptable extent, but some of these judgments have guaranteed people's rights. Also, their access to the services of lawyers has been facilitated. Also, have had an impact on the material and moral rights related to the legal profession. Most of these judgments, which of course were issued correctly and in accordance with the law, have still preserved their credibility, but the credibility of two of them due to the change in the laws is questionable. This article shows the role of Supreme Court in the standardization of law of Lawyers and Attorney at Laws. https://lawresearchmagazine.sbu.ac.ir/article_103285_8f9edf47256a30918a08bd22fa99ba66.pdf