Legal Research Quarterly

Legal Research Quarterly

Biotechnology in the Perspective of the Right to Health in the Light of International Instruments and Domestic Laws: Challenges and Solutions

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
Navid Zamaneh Ghadim 1
Hassan khosravi 2
1 Ph.D. Candidate of International Law, Islamic Azad University, North Tehran Branch
2 Associate Professor of Law, Payame Noor University
10.29252/jlr.2021.185188.1682
Abstract
Abstract
The relationship of law and biotechnology becomes clear if we know how to find solutions to the challenges of biotechnology. Given the various legislative approaches at the national level and the existence of international treaty law gaps, the adoption of a human rights-based approach in regulating the application of biotechnology is of particular importance. Using comparative analytical methods, this study seeks to address the challenges of biotechnology applications from a right to health perspective. The question is to what extent biotechnology applications contribute to the realization of the right to health and whether the protection of the right to health has the capacity to provide a favorable normative model in response to the challenges of biotechnology. Among the applications of this technology are fundamental, normative and structural challenges. The research hypothesis suggests that reinforcing the right to health protection mechanisms at the national and international levels could provide a suitable model for uniform regulation in response to biotech challenges related to human health.
Keywords
Right to Health
Committee on Economic
Social and Cultural Rights
Normalization
Biotechnology
Subjects
  1. Balding, D. et al. Handbook of Statistical Genetics, John Wiley and Sons Publication, Third Edition, 2007.
  2. Druker, S. Altered Genes, Twisted Truth, Clear River Press, 2015.
  3. Engdahl, F. Seeds of Destruction: The Hidden Agenda of Genetic Manipulation, Global Research, 2007.

2- مقالات

  1. Bøhn, T. et al. “The German ban on GM maize MON810: scientifically justified or unjustified?”, Environmental Sciences Europe, Vol. 24:22, 2012.
  2. Brown, K. “Genetic Counseling”, Journal of Legal Medicine, Vol. 29, Issue 3, 2008.
  3. Burke, K. et al. “The Challenge of Consent in Clinical Genome-Wide Testing”, BMJ Journal, Vol. 101, Issue 11, 2016.
  4. Carman, J. et al. “A Long-Term Toxicology Study on Pigs Fed a Combined Genetically Modified (GM) Soy and GM Maize Diet”, Journal of Organic Systems, 8(1), 2013.
  5. Karky, Ramesh Bikram. et al. “Disharmonization in the Regulation of Transgenic Plants in Europe”, Biotechnology Law Report, Vol. 38, Number 6, 2019.
  6. Klein, E. “Human Dignity in German Law”, in The Concept of Human Dignity in Human Rights Discourse, Ed by David Kretzmer and Eckart Klein, Springer, 2002.
  7. Lavi, Sh. “Cloning International Law: The Science and Science Fiction of Human Cloning and Stem Cell Patenting”, Law, Culture and the Humanities, Vol.14(1), 2018.
  8. Malatesta, M. et al. “Fine Structural Analyses of Pancreatic Acinar Cell Nuclei from Mice Fed on Genetically Modified Soybean”, European Journal of Histochemistry, vol. 47 issue 4, 2003.
  9. Marks, S. “Tying Prometheus Down: The International Law of Human Genetic Manipulation”, Chicago Journal of International Law, Vol. 3, Number 1, 2002.
  10. Mesnage, R. et al. “Potential Toxic Effects of Glyphosate and its Commercial Formulations Below Regulatory Limits”, Food and Chemical Toxicology, Vol. 84, 2015.
  11. Nyrhinen, T. et al. “Privacy and Equality in Diagnostic Genetic Testing”, Nursing Ethics, Vol. 14 (3), 2007.
  12. Pattinson, Sh. “Reproductive Cloning: Can Cloning Harm the Clone?”, Medical Law Review, 10 (3), Autumn 2002.
  13. Senyonjo, M. “Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: An Examination of State Obligations”, in: Sarah Joseph & Adam McBeth (ed.), Research Handbook on International Human Rights Law, Cheltenham, Northampton, Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, 2010.
  14. Séralini, G. et al. “Republished study: long-term toxicity of a Roundup herbicide and a Roundup-tolerant genetically modified maize”, Environmental Sciences Europe, 26:14, 2014.
  15. Spector‐Bagdady, K. et al. “Analysis of State Laws on Informed Consent for Clinical Genetic Testing in the Era of Genomic Sequencing”, American Journal of Medical Genetics, Vol. 178, Issue 1, 2018.
  16. Stephenson, A. “Germany’s Ban of Monsanto’s Genetically Modified Maize (MON810): A Violation of International Law”, Trade, Law and Development, Vol. 2: 292, Fall 2010.
  17. Yamin, A. “Not Just a Tragedy Access to Medications as a Right under International Law”, Boston University International Law Journal, Vol. 21, 2003.
  18. Yang, Y. et al. “Governing GMOs in the USA: Science, Law and Public Health”, Journal of the Science and Agriculture, Vol.96, Issue 6, 2016.

 

3- اسناد

  1. Act Ensuring Protection of Embryos in Connection with the Importation and Utilisation of Human Embryonic Stem Cells (Stammzellgesetz - StZG) of 28 June 2002, Bundesgesetzblatt Jahrgang 2002 Part I No. 42.
  2. CESCR, Poverty and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, UN.doc, E/C.12/2001/10.
  3. CESCR, The Nature of States Parties Obligaions, General Comment No.3, 1990.
  4. CESCR, The Right to the Highest Attainable Standard of Health, General Comment No.14, 2000.
  5. CESCR, The Right to the Highest Attainable Standard of Health, General Comment No.14, 2000.
  6. Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Dignity of the Human Being with regard to the Application of Biology and Medicine: Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine, Oviedo, 4.IV.1997, European Treaty Series - No. 164.
  7. Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women, 1979.
  8. Council of Europe, Ad hoc Committee of Experts on Bioethics, Report on Human Artificial Procreation, Strasbourg, 1989.
  9. Council of Europe, Additional Protocol to the Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine, concerning Genetic Testing for Health Purposes, Strasbourg, 27.XI.2008, Council of Europe Treaty Series - No. 203.
  10. Council of Europe, Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Dignity of the Human Being with regard to the Application of Biology and Medicine: Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine, Oviedo, 4.IV.1997, European Treaty Series - No. 164.
  11. Declaration on the Elimination of Violence against Women of 1993.
  12. Explanatory Report to the Additional Protocol to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Dignity of the Human Being with regard to the Application of Biology and Medicine, on the Prohibition of Cloning Human Beings, Paris, 12.I.1998, European Treaty Series - No. 168.
  13. Library of Congress, Congressional Research Service, State Laws on Human Cloning, Series: RS21517, 2003. Available at: http://research.policyarchive.org/3734.pdf
  14. Loi n° 2004-800 du 6 août 2004 relative à la bioéthique. Alias: https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/eli/loi/2004/8/6/2004-800/jo/texte
  15. Loi n° 2013-715 du 6 août 2013 tendant à modifier la loi n° 2011-814 du 7 juillet 2011 relative à la bioéthique en autorisant sous certaines conditions la recherche sur l'embryon et les cellules souches embryonnaires. Alias: https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/eli/loi/2013/8/6/2013-715/jo/texte
  16. Ministry of Health and Social Affairs, Swedish Act concerning Use of Gene Technology on Human Beings and Experiments with Fertilised Ova, 1991.
  17. Ministry of Health and Social Affairs, The Genetic Integrity Act (2006:351), 18 May 2006. Available at: http://www.smer.se/news/the-genetic-integrity-act-2006351/
  18. Parliamentary Assembly, Resolution 1829, Final version, Prenatal sex selection, 2011. Availlable at: https://assembly.coe.int/nw/xml/XRef/Xref-XML2HTML-en.asp?fileid=18020&lang=en
  19. The German Embryo Protection Act (Embryonenschutzgesetz – ESchG) Bundesgesetzblatt 1990, Section 6.
  20. The Hinxton Group, United States: Current Legislation, 2011. Available at: http://www.hinxtongroup.org/usa_map.html
  21. World Health Organization, Resolution WHA 50.37 on Cloning in Human Reproduction, 14 May 1997.
  22. World Health Organization, Resolution WHA 51.10 on Ethical, Scientific and Social Implications of Cloning in Human Health, 16 May 1998.

4- سایت اینترنتی

  1. https://gmo.geneticliteracyproject.org/FAQ/where-are-gmos-grown-and-banned/

47.https://tbinternet.ohchr.org/Treaties/CESCR/Shared%20Documents/DEU/INT_CESCR_CSS_DEU_32152_E.pdf

 

  • Receive Date 27 July 2020
  • Revise Date 07 March 2021
  • Accept Date 05 May 2021