Comparative Study of Evolution of Top Management System of Judiciary to Council System

Document Type : Original Article

Author

10.29252/jlr.2021.183963.1363

Abstract

Designing Suitable state structures for applying Power of sovereignty in form of political powers and state institutions is a requisite for observing the Rule of Law and Good Governance. Theorizing about state structures in executive power has long history. For the last few decades, management structure of judiciary has not been paid attention by scholar and legislators.
Creation independent, efficient and responsible judiciary has been studied by theorists of public law and public administration and founder legislator in different countries. Predominant model in this issue is executive model. Based on that model, Ministry of justice has duty of managing judicial power in administrative and financial affairs and hence is responsible in front of relevant political institutions and authorities such as parliament and council of ministers. But from a few decades ago, independent institutions are forming in judiciary. That institutions have received some of competences of the Ministry of Justice step by step. That institutions are known as “(Supreme) Judicial Council”. The findings of this research indicate that the evolution of the Judicial Management System in Iran during the constitutional amendments in 1989 was in the opposite direction of global developments.
In this essay by collecting resources in a library way and with descriptive analysis method, we study evolution of management system of judiciary to council system through explaining the development of creation, structures, competences and analyzing function of judicial councils in different legal systems.

Keywords

Main Subjects


الف( منابع فارسی
کتاب
0 .آجرلو، اسماعیل، حقوق اساسی کشورهای اسالمی، تهران: پژوهشکده شورای نگهبان، 0120.
5 .پرو، روژه، نهادهای قضایی فرانسه، ترجمه شهرام ابراهیمی، عباس تدین و غالمحسرین
کوشکی، تهران: سلسبیل، 0180.
1 .دفتر مقابله با مواد مخدر و جرم سازمان ملل متحد، راهنمای مرجع تقویات ساالمت و
توانمندی قضایی، ترجمه حسن وکیلیان، تهران: مرکز مطبوعات و انتشارات قروه قضرائیه،
.0121
0 .قاضی شریعتپناهی، سیدابوالفضل، بایستههای حقوق اساسی، تهران: میزان، 0180.
گزارش
0 .اندرسون، جیمز اچ؛ برنستین، دیوید اس. و گری، چریرل دابلیرو، نظاام هاای قضاایی در
کشورهای در حال گ ار؛ ارزیابی گ شته، نگاهی به آینده، ترجمه سعید عطار، مرکز
پژوهشهای مجلس شورای اسالمی، شماره مسلسل: 01010 ،بهمن 0125.
6 .پژوهشکده حقوق خصوصی پژوهشگاه قوه قضرائیه، بررسی تطبیقی اصالحات قضاایی
مبتنی بر حاکمیت قانون، ترجمه فائزه عامری، هران: مرکرز مطبوعرات و انتشرارات قروه
قضائیه، 0120.
4 .کمیسیون اروپایی ارتقای عدالت (CEPEJ ،(ارزیابی نظامهای قضایی اروپا در سال
6106 ،ترجمه گروه مترجمان، تهران: مرکز مطبوعات و انتشارات قوه قضائیه، 0120.
ب( منابع انگلیسی
Book
8.Voermans, wim and Pim Albers, Councils for the Judiciary in EU
Countries, European Commission on Efficiency of Justice (CEPEJ),
Brussels: Pena, 2003.
فصلنامه تحقیقات حقوقی شماره 94 مطالعه تطبیقی تحول نظام مدیریت عالی دادگستری...
141
Article
9.Ginter, J. “Judicial Independence and/or (?) Efficient Judicial
Administration”, Juridica International XVII, 2010.
Repoerts
10.Adenitire, J. Judicial Independence in Europe, the Swedish, Italian and
German Perspectives, 2015.
11.Berthier, Laurent and Helene Pauliat, Administration and Management of
Judicial Systems in Europe, European Commission for the Efficiency of
the Justice (CEPEJ), 2008.
12.European Network of Councils for the Judiciary, Independence and
Accountability of the Judiciary, ENCJ Report 2013-2014, 2014.
13.Garoupa, Nuno and Tom Ginsburg, Guarding the Gardians: Judicial
Councils and Judicial Independence, the University of Chicago, Public
Law and Legal Theory Working Paper No.250, 2008
14.Langbroek, Philip M., Quality Management and Autonomy for CourtOrganization, EGPA Paper 2001 Study Group on Management and Delivery
of Justice, 2001.
15.Venice Commission, Judicial Appointment, Council of Europe, 2007