Legal Research Quarterly

Legal Research Quarterly

Limitations of Positive Legal Recognition of Intersex Persons

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
مهناز بیات 1
Kosar Enjelas 2
1 بهشتی
2 Public Law, Law Faculty, Shahid Beheshti University(SBU). Tehran. Iran
10.29252/jlr.2021.185538.1779
Abstract
Incontrovertibly each person’s body has an undeniable role in his shaping personality. Nowadays and based on scientific efforts, we know sex and accordingly, gender, as a spectrum in inter bodily experience. Over the long years intersex status was considered a “disorder”, but recently “different” experience of the two feminine and masculine sexual templates replaced the prevailing perception of intersex status. Concurrently with these scientific efforts, the process of legal recognition of intersex persons as conscious, dignified and autonomous persons has started; the process which is unknown in many countries.
Legal recognition is an action that during the years, encapsulates the debate on the agent of recognition on the one hand and subject of legal recognition, intersex persons, on the other hand. Birth of positive and negative legal recognition is the result of this action and reaction. In negative legal recognition, only the two feminine and masculine sexual patterns are recognized and intersex persons have to undertake the burden of irreparable and dangerous surgical shaping to join one of the two, without informed consent and necessity of treatment. But in positive legal recognition, existence of component elements such as right to self-determination, right to bodily integrity and right to have infant genitalia, creates a right-based model of legal recognition of intersex persons; a model that informed consent and necessity of treatment comprise its limitations to guarantee mentioned rights and actualize the fundamental idea of positive legal recognition, i.e. the equity between intersex and male or female humane.
Keywords
positive legal recognition
intersex person
informed consent
necessity of treatment
Subjects

  1. Books

    1. Appelbaum, Paul S., Charles W., Lidz, and Alan Meisel, "Informed consent: Legal theory and clinical practice",Oxford University Press, 2001
    2. Miller, Franklin, and Alan Wertheimer, eds, "The ethics of consent: theory and practice", Oxford University Press, 2010
    3. Rosenfeld, M. and Sajó, A. eds., "The Oxford handbook of comparative constitutional law", Oxford University Press, 2012
    4. Scherpe JM, Dutta A, Helms T, editors. The legal status of intersex persons. Intersentia; 2018
    5. van Den Brink M, Dunne P. Trans and Intersex Equality Rights in Europe-a Comparative Analysis. Universiteit van Utrecht; 2018
    6. Van den Brink, Marjolein, and Peter Dunne, "Trans and intersex equality rights in Europe (comparative analysis)", Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2018

     

    Articles

    1. Davy, Zowie, and Michael Toze, "What is gender dysphoria? a critical systematic narrative review", Transgender health 3, No. 1, 2018

     

    1. Dodge, Rachel, Annette P. Daly, Jan Huyton, and Lalage D. Sanders. "The challenge of defining wellbeing." International journal of wellbeing 2, no. 3, 2012

     

    1. Frances, Allen, "DSM5 in distress", Psychology today 23, 2013

     

    1. Hughes, Ieuan A., Chris Houk, S. Faisal Ahmed, Peter A. Lee, and Lawson Wilkins Pediatric Endocrine Society, "Consensus statement on management of intersex disorders", Journal of pediatric urology 2, No. 3, 2006
    2. Hughes, Ieuan A., Chris Houk, S. Faisal Ahmed, Peter A. Lee, and Lawson Wilkins,"Consensus statement on management of intersex disorders", Journal of pediatric urology2, No. 3, 2006
    3. Kraus C. Classifying intersex in DSM-5: Critical reflections on gender dysphoria. Archives of sexual behavior. Jul 1;44(5), 2015

     

    1. Merz, J.F., “On a decision-making paradigm of medical informed consent”, J Leg Med, 14, 1993
    2. New MI, Tong YK, Yuen T, Jiang P, Pina C, Chan KA, Khattab A, Liao GJ, Yau M, Kim SM, Chiu RW. Noninvasive prenatal diagnosis of congenital adrenal hyperplasia using cell-free fetal DNA in maternal plasma. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. 2014
    3. Nordenvall, Anna Skarin, Louise Frisén, Anna Nordenström, Paul Lichtenstein, and Agneta Nordenskjöld, "Population based nationwide study of hypospadias in Sweden, 1973 to 2009: incidence and risk factors", The Journal of urology 191, No. 3, 2014
    4. Nordenfelt, Lennart, "Understanding the concept of health", Strategies for health: An anthology, 2007

     

     

    Cases

    1. National Legal Services Authority v. Union of India, 5 S.C.C. 438 (2014).
    2. Schloendorff v. Society of New York Hospital, 105 N.E. 92, 211 N.Y. 125, 133 N.Y.S. 1143 (1914).
    3. Slater v., Baker & Stapleton, 1767 Eng Rep 95 860 (1767).

    ج) منابع الکترونیک

    27.European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights, 2015, "The fundamental rights situation of intersex people", available at: https://fra.europa.eu/en/publication/2015/fundamental-rights-situation-intersex-people. Accessed February 14, 2019.

    1. Gender Expression and Sex Characteristics Act 2015. Available at: https://tgeu.org/gender-identity-gender-expression-sex-characteristics-act-malta-2015/. Accessed March 18, 2019. Article 2, 3, 14(1),

    29.Civil Status Act of Germany. Available at: https://www.bundesverfassungsgericht.de/SharedDocs/Entscheidungen/EN/2017/10/rs20171010_1bvr201916en.html. Accessed April 26, 2019. Article 21(1) and 22(3),

    30.Constitutional Court of Austria (15 June 2018). Available at: https://www.refworld.org/publisher,AUT_FCCA,CASELAW,,,,0.html. Accessed Februery 10, 2019

     

  • Receive Date 26 November 2020
  • Revise Date 28 April 2021
  • Accept Date 19 June 2021