The Multiplicity of Lawyers and The Challenge of Communicating and Calculating Deadlines (Some Critics of Judgments of Supreme and Appeal Court)

Document Type : Original Article

Author

University of Tehran, Faculty of Law & Political Science

10.29252/jlr.2021.184601.1523

Abstract

The principle of communicating to all and the need to identify its effects for the benefit of all, and the benefit of unification of proceedings, reinforces the defense of the exigence of communicating for all lawyers and to know their right to act until another lawyer does not acted yet. The judgments of Supreme court (5th, 8th & 10th chambers) and some appeal courts in province of Tehran (10th and 49th chamber) is somehow country together, and are based on a variety of articles and principles based of Civil Code interpretation or Procedural Law Practices. Some are based on the principles and interpretations of Civil Code provisions and some have been reached to communicating to the first or second lawyer on the basis of the professional ethics of lawyers. This article reviews and evaluates their views and arguments and relies on the separation of Civil Code from Civil Procedural Law.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

  1. CADIET, Loïc, et Emmanuel JEULAND, Droit judiciaire privé, Paris, Litec, 2016, 9e éd.
  2. Code de procédure civile, (CPC), Annoté par : Laurent Dargent, sous la dir. de Pierre Callé, Paris, Dalloz, 2018.

 

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 06 January 2020
  • Revise Date: 16 June 2021
  • Accept Date: 24 August 2021

Share

How to cite

Statistics