The critical study of the Iranian labor adjudication system by the consideration to the German labor system

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 asistante of law

2 The Faculty of Law and Political Sciences, University of Tehran

10.29252/jlr.2021.224297.2026

Abstract

The existence of an effective labor adjudication system is one of the most important criteria in guaranteeing workers' rights, because in a dispute between a worker and the employer, the rights of the parties, especially workers, are guaranteed in the best way. Consequently, studying the other country’s adjudication systems can be useful in discovering the strengths and defaults of the domestic system. In this regard, one of the most modern labor adjudication systems belongs to Germany, which has created an independent judicial structure for labor proceedings. For the above reasons, the main question of this essay is that what achievements have the german system for the Iranian system. This research that is based on the analytical-descriptive method has investigated the position, structure, jurisdiction and, procedure of Iranian and German labor adjudication system by methodological principle in comparative law called "functionalism". The results of this study are to be outlined in three issues; the principle of judicialization and independence in labor adjudication, creating functional mechanisms for executing negotiation in pre-trial or in-trial and, making an efficient precedent that are needs of the Iranian system.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

  •  

     

    1- Books and Articles

     

     

    • Berger, Helge; Neugart, Michael, 2012, How German Labour decide- An Econometric case Study- , German Economic Review, 13(1):56-70
    • Francken, J)2006), “Das Arbeitsgericht als Multi-Door Courthouse” [The labour court as a multi-door courthouse], in Neue Juristische Wochenschrift, Vol. 59, No. 16, pp. 1103– 1107
    • Ebisui, Minawa & Sean Cooney and Colin Fenwick,(2016), Resolving individual labour disputes: A comparative overview , ; International Labour Office. - Geneva: ILO
    • Kirchner, Jens (2010) Key Aspects of German Employment and Labour Law, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
    • Michaels, R (2006) ‘The Functional Method of Comparative Law’, in Reimann and Zimmermann (2006) 339
    • Rieble, V. (1991). “Schiedsstellen für Arbeitsrecht – nur eine Episode?” [Conciliation committees for labour law – just a phase?], in Neue Zeitschrift für Arbeitsrecht, Vol. 8, No. 21, pp. 841–843
    • Peter Axel Windel & Tong-Shuan YangIs (2012), There a Need for Independent Labour Courts? National Taiwan University Law Review , [Vol. 7: 2 , 2012
    • Prütting, H. (2013), “Annex: Besondere Verfahrensarten” [Special procedures], in Germelmann, Matthes and Prütting (eds
    • Stober, R(1979), “Staatsgerichtsbarkeit und Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit” [Public courts and courts of arbitration], in Neue Juristische Wochenschrift, Vol. 32, No. 39, pp. 2001– 2007
    • Samuel, Gefforey (2014), An Introduction to Comparative Law Theory and Method, Hart publishing
    • Veranken, Martin (2009), Death of labour law? Comparative perspectives , Melbourne, Melbourne University Press
    • Voluntary Conciliation and Arbitration, 1951, Recommendation(No. 92), ILO
    • Zweigert, K, and Kötz, H (1998) An Introduction to Comparative Law (Oxford, 3rd edn; trans Weir, T
    • Federal labour court, , the president of federal labour court, (2014),

     

     

    2- Acts

     

     

     

    • Arbeitsgerichtsgesetz( ArbGG) , Ausfertigungsdatum: 03.09.1953
    • Betriebsverfassungsgesetz (Works Constitution Act: WCA) 2001
    •  Grundgesetz für die Bundesrepublik Deutschland , vom 23. Mai 1949
    • Tarifvertragsgesetz (Collective Agreements Act: CAA) 1969
Legal Research Quarterly
Volume 24, Issue 95 - Serial Number 95
November 2021
Pages 283-308

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 24 October 2021
  • Revise Date: 22 November 2021
  • Accept Date: 22 November 2021

Share

How to cite

Statistics