Unitization and Determination of Tract Participation in Unit Operating Agreements

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Associated/Faculty of Law and Political science/ University of Tehran/ Tehran/ Iran

2 PhD student of Private Law/ Kish international campus/ university of Tehran/ Kish/ Iran

10.29252/jlr.2021.223378.1979

Abstract

Countries with hydrocarbon resources, including Iran, typically prefer to break up their oil-rich areas into blocks and then assign each of them to contracting companies separately to benefit from their technical and financial capability. But nature is not easily in harmony with human agreements. this can be illustrated by the many examples of oil and gas field inconsistencies with pre-defined contractual boundaries. Hydrocarbon reserves may be located between two or more contract areas that, in the absence of necessary arrangements, a disastrous competition for extracting from the joint reservoir can be formed. But the question of how contractors of two or more separate contract areas can reduce costs by leaving competition and how they can cooperate to increase the ultimate efficiency of the reservoir are the subjects which unitization and unit operating agreements have been created to deal with them. The determination of the parties’ rights and obligations in this form of cooperation comes with some challenges due to lack of sufficient information about shared petroleum reservoir. Issue analyzing shows that contracts’ terms and conditions must provide possibility of redetermination of parties’ participation synced with project development. Through this why eventually each party achieves their fair participation.

Keywords

References

  •  

    A: Articles

    • David M. O. “Joint Development of Common Offshore Oil and Gas Deposits: ‘Mere’ State Practice or Customary International Law?” The American Journal of International Law 93,
    • Deemer P. "Unitisation Agreement”, Conference Paper, University of Dundee, 2004.
    • Ernest O. T. Texas Railroad Commissioner, “A Primer on Proration and Oil Conservation as Practiced in Texas”, delivered before The Third Regional Resources Translation Work Conference, North Texas Teachers College, Texas: Denton, 1946.
    • Gideon W. “Addressing Perceptions of Procedural Unfairness in Compulsory Unitization by Appointing Neutral Experts”, American University Law Review 6, 2006.
    • Graham S. B. “Fair Share or Fair Game? Great Principle, Good Technology—But Pitfalls in Practice”, Natural Resources Lawyer 8, 1975.
    • Leary Gary L. “Compulsory Unitization-The Answer to Oil and Gas Conservation?”, UCLA Law Rev 7, 1960.
    • Libecap Gary D. & Wiggins Steven N.”Oil field unitization: Contractual Failure in the Presence of Imperfect Information”, American Economic Review 75, 1985.
    • Pound R. “Law Finding Through Experience and Reason”, Three Lectures, University of Georgia Press 38,1960.
    • Reynolds Thomas A. "Delimitation, Exploitation, And Allocation of Transboundary Oil & Gas Deposits Between Nation-States", ILSA Journal of International & Comparative Law 7, 1995.
    • Weaver J & Asmus D. “Unitizing Oil and Gas Fields Around the World: A Comparative Analysis of National Laws and Private Contracts”, Houston Journal of International Law 28, 2006.
    • Williams H. R. & Meyers C. J. “The Effect of Pooling and Unitization Upon Oil & Gas Leases”, California Law Review 45, 1957.

     

    B: Books

     

    • Champion R. Forming the Unit – Why Unitize? The Industry Perspective” in Federal Onshore Oil and Gas Pooling and Unitization, Colorado: Rocky Mountain Mineral Law Foundation,
    • Daintith T., Willoughby G. & Hill A. The United Kingdom Oil and Gas Law, London: Sweet & Maxwell Ltd, 2000.
    • English W. Unitisation Agreements in Upstream Oil and Gas Agreements, London: Sweet & Maxwell Ltd, 1996.
    • Kramer B. M. & Martin P. H. The Law of Pooling and Unitization. 3nd Ed, California: LexisNexis, 2017.
    • Kuntz E. A Treatise on The Law of Oil and Gas, California: LexisNexis,1993.
    • Lowe J., Anderson O., Smith E. & Pierce D. Cases and Materials on Oil and Gas Law. 4nd Ed, Minnesota: West Academic Publishing, 2002.
    • MacLeod N. Unitisation, Chapter 13 of Oil and Gas Law: Current Practice & Emerging Trends, Edinburgh: Edinburgh Scholarship, 2015.
    • Marranzino T. A., Pink J. B. & Cavaleri A. C. A Primer on Federal Unitization, Unit Agreements and Unit Operating Agreements, American Association of Professional Landmen (AAPL), Texas: Landman publication.2010.
    • Pereira E. G. & Carloni G. Understanding Joint Operating Agreements, Cambridge: Intersentia,
    • Roberts P. Unitisation and the JOA Appendix D of Joint Operating Agreements - A practical guide, London: Globe Business Publishing, 2010.
    • Taylor P.G. & Tyne S. M. Taylor and Winsor on Joint Operating Agreements: Oil and Gas Law, London: Sweet & Maxwell, 1992.

     

    C: Documents

    • AIPN - Association of International Petroleum Negotiators , “Model Form International Unitization and Unit Operating agreement”, Houston, 2006.
    • AIPN - Association of International Petroleum Negotiators “Guidance Notes to AIPN Model Form International Unitization and Unit Operating Agreement”, Houston, 2006.

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 29 August 2021
  • Revise Date: 18 March 2023
  • Accept Date: 11 December 2021

Share

How to cite

Statistics