Assessing of construction and use of underground warfare with the legal principles of armed conflict

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Professor, Public Law Department, Faculty of Law and Political Sciences, University of Tehran

2 MA. in International Law, Faculty of Law and Political Sciences, University of Tehran

10.29252/jlr.2022.223745.1997

Abstract

Non-governmental armed groups have always resorted to various innovations in order to balance their forces. Tunnels warfare are unique innovations that increase their military capability and double their ability to defeat enemies. The construction of tunnels in wars has always been attractive to users for their various applications, which has become a winning strategy. Since the global powers' intelligence and military capabilities have been enhanced, underground tunnels have emerged as an impenetrable haven for non-governmental armed groups, balancing unequal military forces on both sides. Inside underground structures, soldiers and military personnel can conduct military operations without identification and with minimal exposure to enemy surveillance and intelligence systems. But tunnels have not yet been the subject of any armed conflict law, and the legal status of it remains questionable. The main task of the research is to find a legal framework on underground warfare to reveal the unknown aspects of this warfare. The use of tunnels, despite its many legal challenges, seems to be a function of the general principles of international humanitarian law, which have distinct legal effects as a weapon or method of warfare.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

  1. A) Books
  • Aran, Gideon, The Smile of the Human Bomb: New Perspectives on Suicide Terrorism, Cornell University Press, 2018.
  • Boothby, William, Weapons and the Law of Armed Conflict, Oxford University Press, 2009.
  • Boothby, William, Weapons and the Law of Armed Conflict, Oxford University Press, 2009.
  • Gill & etc, Yearbook of International Humanitarian Law 2013, T.M.C. Asser Press, 2014.
  • Green, James A., Cyber Warfare: A Multidisciplinary Analysis, Routledge, 2016.
  • Horowitz, Michael C., The Diffusion of Military Power: Causes and Consequences for International Politics, Princeton University Press, 2010.
  • Jachec-Neale, Agnieszka, The Concept of Military Objectives in International Law and Targeting Practice, Routledge, 2014.
  • Morcan, James & Morcan, Lance, UNDERGROUND BASES: Subterranean Military Facilities and the Cities Beneath Our Feet, Sterling Gate Books, 2015.
  • Pape, robert A. & Feldman, james k., Cutting the Fuse: The Explosion of Global Suicide Terrorism and How to Stop It, The University of Chicago Press, 2010.
  • Pedahzur, Ami, Root Causes of Suicide Terrorism: The Globalization of Martyrdom, Routledge, 2006.
  • Reus-Smit, Christian, The politics of international law, Cambridge University Press, 2004,
  • Richemond-Barak, Daphné, Underground Warfare, Oxford University Press, 2017.
  • Solis, Gary D., The Law of Armed Conflict: International Humanitarian Law in War, Cambridge University Press, 2016.
  1. B) Articles
  • Doswald-Beck, Louise, “The San Remo Manual on International Law Applicable to Armed Conflicts at Sea”, The American Journal of International Law, Vol. 89, Issue 1, (1995), 192-208.
  • Fidler, David P., “The International Legal Implications of "Non-Lethal" Weapons”, Michigan Journal of International Law, Vol. 21, (1999), 51–100.
  • Fry, James D., “Contextualized legal reviews for the methods and means of warfare: Cave combat and international humanitarian law”, Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, Vol. 44, Issue 2, (2006), 453-519.
  • Gross, Michael L, “The Second Lebanon War: The Question of Proportionality and the Prospect of Non-Lethal Warfare”, Journal of Military Ethics, Vol. 7, Issue 1, (2008), 1-22.
  • Henderson, Ian, “Manual on International Law Applicable to Air and Missile Warfare: A Review”, Military Law and Law of War Review, Vol. 49, Issue 1 & 2, (2010), 169-184.
  • Leibovici & etc, “Blast Injuries: Bus Versus Open-Air Bombings--A Comparative Study of Injuries in Survivors of Open-Air Versus Confined-Space Explosions”, The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care, Vol. 41, Issue 6, (1996), 1030-1035.
  • Lynn, William J., “Defending a New Domain: The Pentagon's Cyberstrategy”, Foreign affairs (Council on Foreign Relations), Vol. 89, Issue 5, (2010), pp. 97-108.
  • Shue, Henry & Wippman, David, “Limiting Attacks on Dual-Use Facilities Performing Indispensable Civilian Functions”, Cornell International Law Journal, Vol. 35, Issue 3, (2002), 559-580.
  • Silberman, Jared, “Non-Lethal Weaponry and Non-Proliferation”, Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy, Vol. 19, Issue 1, (2014), 347-354.
  1. C) Cases
  • ICJ Reports, Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons (Advisory Opinion), 8 July 1996.
  • Prosecutor v. Dusko Tadic, International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY), 1995.

C)Documents

  • Amnesty International, Israel/Gaza - Operation "Cast Lead": 22 days of death and destruction, 2 July 2009.
  • Human Rights Situation in Palestine and Other Occupied Arab Territories, A/HRC/10/NGO/101, 27 February 2009.
  • Human Rights Watch Report, Rain of Fire - Israel’s Unlawful Use of White Phosphorus in Gaza (Report on Israel's unlawful use of white phosphorus munitions during its 22-day military operations in Gaza), 25 March 2009, Available at: https://www.hrw.org/report/2009/03/25/rain-fire/israels-unlawful-use-white-phosphorus-gaza
  • Pilloud, Claude & Pictet, Jean & Sandoz, Yves & Swinarski, Christophe & Bruno Zimmerman, Commentary on the Additional Protocols of 8 June 1977 to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, International Committee of the Red Cross, 1987.
  • UN Human Rights Council, Report of the Independent International Commission of Inquiry on the Syrian Arab Republic, A/HRC/24/46, 16 August 2013.
  • United Nations, Protocol on Prohibitions or Restrictions on the Use of Mines, Booby-Traps and Other Devices, 10 October 1980.
  • United Nations, Convention on Prohibitions or Restrictions on the Use of Certain Conventional Weapons Which May Be Deemed to be Excessively Injurious or to Have Indiscriminate Effects (and Protocols), 10 October 1980.

 

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 15 September 2021
  • Revise Date: 27 December 2021
  • Accept Date: 12 January 2022

Share

How to cite

Statistics