ENFORCEMENT OF DOMESTIC ARBTRAL AWARDS IN THE FEDERAL ARBITRATION ACT

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 . PhD, Faculty of Law, Theology & Islamic Thoughts, Islamic Azad University: Najaf Abad Branch, Najaf Abad, Iran

2 Professor of Law, Faculty of Law, Theology & Islamic Thoughts, Islamic Azad University: Najaf Abad Branch, Najaf Abad, Iran

3 Associate Professor, Faculty of Law, Theology & Islamic Thoughts, Islamic Azad University: Najaf Abad Branch, Najaf Abad, Iran

Abstract

Arbitration has been considered as a most significant alternative dispute resolution process in United States of America. In relating to enforcement of arbitration awards there are a principal source of law: "Federal Arbitration Act" which is adopted in 1925.Articles 9-14 of this statute contains provisions about enforcement and obstacles to arbitration awards. Enforcement of arbitral awards requires the judicial procedures and supervisions in United States. In accordance with this law the party who is seeking for enforcement must file a motion (confirmation request) and bring necessary documents to the appropriate court during one year. Arbitration awards are not enforceable without judicial confirmation. Vacation, modification and correction of arbitral awards have limitative statutory grounds which are stipulated in the law. The courts are uncertain concerning to whether non-statutory grounds for vacating of awards accepted. Despite of this doubt, however, the other grounds have been created in U.S judicial precedent. Nonetheless both legislature and courts in U.S.A endeavor for esteem and prevalence of arbitration process and ordain some circumscriptions for enforcement and vacating of arbitration awards.

Keywords

Main Subjects


  1. Articles

    Blankley, K. M. “A Uniform Theory of Federal Court Jurisdiction under the Federal Arbitration Act”, George Mason Law Review, Forthcoming, 2015.

    Brady, M. J. “The Arbitration Train That Just Cannot Be Stopped”, The Metropolitan Corporate Counsel, June 2003.

    Rudolph Cole, S. “Fairness in Securities Arbitration: A Constitutional Mandate?”, Pace Law Review, Volume 26, Issue 45, 2006.

    Sebok, A. J. “The Unwritten Federal Arbitration Act”, DePaul Law Review, Volume 65, Issue 505, 2016.

    Szalai, I. S. “Exploring the Federal Arbitration Act Through the Lens of History”, Journal of Dispute Resolution, Volume 115, Issue 7, 2016.

    Yelonsley, M. J. “DIRECTV, Inc. v. Imburgia and the Continued Ascendance of Federal Common Law: Class-Action Waivers and Mandatory Arbitration under the Federal Arbitration Act 22 Roger Williams U. L”, Roger Williams University Law Review, Volume 22, Issue 1, 2017.

    Rule

    Federal Arbitration Act 1925.

    Electronic Resources

    Colagiovanni, J. and Hartmann, T. “Enforcing Arbitration Awards”, Electric Law Library, Available at: http://www.lectlaw.com/files/adr l 5.htm, Last Revised: August 9, 2007.

    Lou Whiteman. “Arbitration's Fall from Grace”, Law .com In-House Counsel, July 13, 2006, Available at: http://www.law .com/jsp/ihc/PubArticlelHC .jsp? i d-1 152695 125655

    Mazadoorian, H. “Is Arbitration More Costly Than Litigation for Corporations?”, Law.com In-House Counsel, March 12, 2007, Available at: http://www.law.com/jsp/ihc/PubArticlelHC.jsp?idn-1173434607698 

    1. S. Chamber of Commerce Press Release, “Anti -Arbitration Bill Sets Dangerous Precedent, Warns U .S. Chamber of Commerce”, Available at: http://www.uschamber.com/press/releases/2000/june/00-81.htm, Last Visited:  August 9, 2007.

    Cases

    1. Marcantel. J, The Crumbled Difference Between Legal and Illegal Arbitration Awards: Hall Street Associates and the Waning Public Policy Exception 14 Fordham J.Corp. & FIN, L, 597, 635 (2009).
    2. Edwards Sr Sons, Inc. v. McCollough, 967 F.2d 1401, 1404 (9th Cir. 1992).

    Allied-Bruce Terminix Cos., Inc. v. Dobson 513 U. S. 265, 277 (1995).

    American Laser Vision, P.A. v. The Laser Vision Institute, LLC, 487 F.3d 255, 259 (5th Cir. 2007).

    Apex Plumbing Supply Inc. v. U.S. Supply Co., Inc., 142 F.3d 188, 191 (4th Cir. 1998).

    Armendariz v. Foundation Health Psychcar e Servs., Inc., 2000 WL 1201652 (Cal. Aug. 24, 2000).

    At&t Mobility llC v. Concepcion, 131 S. Ct. 1740 - Supreme Court 2011.

    Babrham v. AG Edwards & Sons, Inc., 376 F.3d 377 (5' Cir. 2004).

    Baravati v. Josephthal Lyon & Ross. 28 F.3d 704 (7th Cir. 1994).

    Brown v. Rauscher Pierce Refsnes, Inc., 994 F.2d 775, 782 (11th Cir. 1993).

    Carbajal v. CWPSC, INC., 245 Cal. App. 4th 227 - Cal: Court of Appeal, 4th Appellate Dist., 3rd Div. 2016.

    Commonwealth Coatings Corp. v. Continental Casualty Co., 393 U.S. 145 (1968).

    Craighead v. MIDWAY RENT A CAR, INC., Cal: Court of Appeal, 2nd Appellate Dist., 3rd Div. (2018).

    Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. Byrd, 470 U . S. 213, 22 1 (1985)

    El Dorado School District No. 15 v. Continental Casualty Company, 247 F.3d 843, 848 (" Cir. 2001).

    Enameling Corp. v. General Bronz. e Corp., 434 F.2d 330 (5th Cir. 1970).

    Forsythe International, S.A. v. Gibbs Oil Co. of Texas,196 F.2d 1017 (5' Cir. 1990).

    Freeman v. Pittsburgh Glass Works, LLC, 2013 WL 811884 at *8-9 (3rd Cir. 2013).

    GC and KB Investments Inc. v. Wilson, 326 F.3c1 1096, 1105 (9± Cir. 2003).

    George Watts & Sons, Inc. v. Tiffany and Co.,248 F.3d 577 (7th Cir. 2001).

    Green Tree Fin.Corp.-Alabama v. Randolph, 531 U.S.79 (2000).

    Greenberg v. Bear, Stearns &Co.,220 F.3d 22, 27 (2nd Cir. 2000).

    Hakala v. Deutsche Bank AG, 2004 WL 10577S8 (S.D.N.Y. 2004).

    Hall Street Associates v. Mattel, Inc, 552 U.S. 576 (2008).

    Harshad & Nasir Corp. v. Global Sign Systems, Inc., 14 Cal. App. 5th 523 - Cal: Court of Appeal, 2nd (2017).

    Hoteles Condado Beach, La Concha and Convention Center v. Union de Tronquistas Local 901. 763 F.2d 34 (5th Cir. 1985).

    IDS Life Ins. Co. v. Royal Alliance Associates, Inc., 266 F.3d 645, 650 (7' Cir. 2001).

    Iskanian v. CLS Transportation Los Angeles, LLC, 327 P. 3d 129 - Cal: Supreme Court 2014.

    KALO v. RASHID ALAM, Cal: Court of Appeal, 4th Appellate Dist., 3rd Div. 2017.

    Kyocera Corp. v. Prudential Bache Trade Services, Inc341 F.3d. 987, 1002-03 (9th Cir.2003).

    Lifecare Intl. Inc. v. CD Medical, Inc. 6 F.3d 429, 435 (11th Cir. 1995).

    Lozada v. Dale Baker Oldsmobile, Inc. 91 E. Supp.2d 1087 (W.D. Mich. 2000); Powertel v. Bexley, 743 So.2d 570 (Ha. App. 1999).

    Metromedia Energy, Inc. v. Enserch Energy Servs., Inc., 409 F.3d 574, 579 (3r1 Cir. 2005).

    Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc., 473 U. S. 614, 625-26 (1985).

    Morani v. Landenberger, 196 F.3d 9, 11 (1" Cir. 1999).

    Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Constr. Corp., 460 U .  S. I,24 (1983)

    Newark Stereotypers Union No. 18 v. Newark Morning Ledger Co.397 F.2d 594, 599 (3rd Cir. 1968).

    Ometto v. ASA Bioenergy Holding A.G., 2013 WL 174259 at *2 (S.D.N.Y.2013).

    Parsons & \Mrittemore Alabama Machinery and Services Corp. v. Yeargin Const. Co., Inc., 744 F.2d 1482, 1485 (11th Cir.1984).

    Patten v. Signator Insurance Agency, Inc., 441 F.3d 230, 235 (4'h Cir.2006).

    Pennsylvania Eng. Corp. v. Islip Res. Recovery,710 F. Supp. 456, 460 (E.D.N.Y.1989).

    Positive Software Solutions, Inc. v. New Century Mortgage Corp., 476 F3d 278 (5th Cir. 2007).

    Pr ima Paint Corp. v. Flood &Conklin Mfg. Corp., 388 U. S. 395 (1967)

    Re VMS Securities litigation, 21 F.3d 139 (7th Cir. 1994).

    Sarofim v. Trust Company ofthe West440 F.3d 214 (5th Cir. 2006).

    Schmitz v. Zilveti 20 F.3d 1043 - Court of Appeals,9th Circuit,1994.

    Schoch v. InfoUSA, Inc.,341 F.3d 785, 788 (8`h Cir. 2003).

    Scott v. Yoho, 248 Cal. App. 4th 392 - Cal:Court of Appeal, 2nd Appellate Dist., 5th Div. 2016.

    Sheldon v. Vermonty, 269 F.3d 1202, 1207 (10th Cir. 2001)

    Starr Elec. Co. v. Basic Constr.Co., 586 F.Supp. 964(N.C. 1982).

    Taylor v. Nelson,788 F .2d 220 (4th Cir. 1986) 788 F.2d at 225.

    Thian Lok Tio v. Washington Hosp. Center, 753 F. Supp2d 9, 17 (2010).