Study of the cross-examination in the American judicial system with the feasibility of its acceptance in Iranian law

Document Type : Original Article

Author

Assistant Professor, Faculty of Humanities, University of Maragheh, Maragheh, Iran

Abstract

In terms of the widespread use of witness testimony as one of the proofs of litigation in all legal systems, ascertaining the validity and value of this evidence is always considered one of the concerns of all legal systems, and each legal system according to its legal basis has clarified the conditioفns of its authenticity and validity. In American legal system, the process of cross-examination of the witness is one of the ways to ensure the accuracy of the testimony of witnesses, which is done by asking the witness numerous questions by the other side of the case. In Iranian law, despite the provision of powers for the court to question the witness, it is not possible to crossexamine the witness by lawyers and litigants. The existence of other solutions to guarantee honesty of the witness should be considered as main reason for not paying attention to this institution in Iranian law. The difference in the type of legal system historically and the existence of some special institutions and concepts in American law are other reasons that have been considered in the current research in explaining the differences. Since the issue of false testimony is one of the problems of Iran's judicial system and the inadequacy of the provisions related to the validation of witness testimony in Iranian law has been proven in practice, in the present study, in order to solve the problems related to false testimony the solution available in the legal system of America has been examined.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

 
References
Books
Friedenthal, J. miller, A. sexton, J. and Hershkoff, H. Civil procedure, Case and Materials, 11TH Edition, American Case Book Series, 2013.
Katouzian, Nasser, Proof and Evidence of Proof, First Volume, Tehran: Mizan, 2016. (in Persian)
Tanford, A. The Trial Process: Law, Tactics and Ethics – Chapter 7 Cross-Examination, Carolina Academia Press, Fourth Edition, 2010.
Wellman, F. The Art of Cross Examination, New York: The New York times review, 2014.
Wigmore, John Henry. Evidence in Trials at Common Law, Volume 11, Little, Brown, 1985.
Articles
Ahmadvand, Khalilollah and Hassan Taal, “A Study of the Role and Status of Testimony in Court”, International Quarterly Journal of Ghanoun-Yar, Volume 4, Issue 16, 2020. (in Persian)
Bowden, P. Plater, D. “Balancing Fairness to Victims, Society and Defendants in Cross Examination of Vulnerable Witness: an Impossible Triangulation?”, Melbourne University Law Review, Volume 37, 2014.
Czerwien, J. “Preserving the Civil Jury Right, Reconsidering the Scope of the Seventh Amendment”, Case Western Reserve Law Review, Volume 65, Issue 2, 2014.
Darouei, Abbas Ali, Hassan Eskandari and Hossein Eskandari, “Contemplation on the Challenges of Testimony in the Iranian Judicial System”, Journal Research on Islamic Jurisprudence and Law, Volume 17, Issue 65, 2021. (in Persian)
Fluet, C. Lanzi, T. “Cross-Examination”, Centre de recherche sur les risques les enjeux économiques et les politiques publiques, 2021, Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3959937/
Ghorban Amarji, Mohammad Zaman and Jamshid Yahya-Pour, “Comparative Study of Testimony and Its Probative Value in the Iranian and English Legal Systems”, Journal of Political and International Researches, Volume 13, Issue 52, 2022. (in Persian)
Hadi, M. “Beyond the Witness Stand: Exploring Modern Approaches To cross Examination in Pakistan”, 2023, Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4483302/
Horan, J. “Perceptions of The Civil Jury System”, Monash University Law Review, Volume 31, 2005.
Liegner, C. “a Modern Look at the Right to a Civil Jury Trial Under the Maine Constitution”, Maine Law Review, Volume 69, 2017.
Malone, P. “Burying the Ten Commandments of Cross-Examination”, Litigation, Volume 43, Issue 1, 2016.
Mohseni, Hassan, “Civil Procedure Systems”, Private Law Studies Quarterly, Volume 37, Issue 1, 2007. (in Persian)
Riazi, Ali Akbar, “Questioning the Other Side's Witness”, Journal of the Bar Association, New Volume, Issue 150 and 151, 1990. (in Persian)
Ryan, J. “The American Trial Jury, Current Issues and Controversies”, Social Education; Arlington, Volume 63, Issue 7, 1999.
Safari, Nahid and Parviz Dehghani, “Jury in Civil Claims”, Journal of Contemporary Comparative Legal Studies (Former Islamic Jurisprudence and Law), Volume 10, Issue 18, 2019. (in Persian)
Taghi-Pour, Alireza, “Restrictions of Examination of Witness in Rules of Procedure and Jurisprudence of International Criminal Courts”, Journal of Contemporary Comparative Legal Studies (Former Islamic Jurisprudence and Law), Volume 1, Issue 2, 2011. (in Persian)
Tanford, A. “Keeping Cross-Examination Under Control”, American Journal of Trial Advocacy, Volume 18, 2002.
Tavakoli, Saeed, “The Value of Testimony and the Limits of Its Validity in the Iranian Legal System”, Journal of Trial, Volume 10, Issue 56, 2006. (in Persian)
White, Penny. “Examination, Cross-Examination, and Redirect Examination”, 2015. Available at: https://www.sog.unc.edu/sites/default/files/course_materials/White_Examination.pdf/
Zajac R. O’Neill, S. and Hayne, H. “Disorder in the Courtroom? Child Witnesses under Cross-Examination”, Developmental Review, Volume 32, Issue 3, 2012.

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 22 July 2022
  • Revise Date: 02 February 2024
  • Accept Date: 02 March 2024

Share

How to cite

Statistics