The legislator, in 2008 embarked on amendment of Article 34 of Registration Code and made a series of changes on the sale of mortgaged property. But alongside of the advantages these amendments, there still are some defects and vaguenesses: Firstly, the text of Note 1 of the Article, at least in apparent, comes to mind that the enforcement of each mortgage contract must be performed by the interference of public authority and official formalities, while this duty, concerning the small and petty contracts, does not look logical. Secondly, the mentioned Article has not anticipate for some of the measures of pawnee after the infraction of debtor to pay debt, any period. This has caused the process of enforcement with ambiguity and it is probable in some circumstances, culminates in the debtor's denial of justice. In this paper, the authors, while explaining the above objections, try to offer the ways to solution of the problems.
Ghasempour, A., shahbaz ghahfarrokhi, S., & Haghi, H. (2024). A reflection on the territory of Article 34 of the Registration Act. Legal Research Quarterly, (), -. doi: 10.48308/jlr.2024.234502.2662
MLA
Amin Ghasempour; sajjad shahbaz ghahfarrokhi; Hossein Haghi. "A reflection on the territory of Article 34 of the Registration Act", Legal Research Quarterly, , , 2024, -. doi: 10.48308/jlr.2024.234502.2662
HARVARD
Ghasempour, A., shahbaz ghahfarrokhi, S., Haghi, H. (2024). 'A reflection on the territory of Article 34 of the Registration Act', Legal Research Quarterly, (), pp. -. doi: 10.48308/jlr.2024.234502.2662
VANCOUVER
Ghasempour, A., shahbaz ghahfarrokhi, S., Haghi, H. A reflection on the territory of Article 34 of the Registration Act. Legal Research Quarterly, 2024; (): -. doi: 10.48308/jlr.2024.234502.2662
)