Despite the different definitions of smart contracts that have been expressed, there is still disagreement regarding their definition and legal nature. Therefore, it is necessary to define the actual legal meaning and nature of a smart contract. Moreover, due to the self-executing feature of these contracts, the study of dispute resolution in these contracts is necessary. In the current research, after reviewing the definitions of smart contracts and how to ensure the self-execution features of them in the blockchain platform, the possible ways to resolve disputes in these types of agreements have been discussed. In conclusion, based on the specific feathers of these agreements, Arbitration has been suggested as the best suitable dispute resolution, and JUR and Kleros have been mentioned as examples of electronic arbitration with a mechanism specific to the blockchain platform to resolve disputes arising from smart contracts. Moreover, examples of electronic arbitration with a compatible mechanism to the blockchain platforms that can be accessible at the international level were examined, and online, decentralized, and fair dispute resolution methods in blockchain systems were proposed.
Karimi, Abbas and Sahar Karimi, New Thoughts in Contracts Law, Tehran: Dadgostar, Second Edition, 2022. (in Persian)
Articles
Buchwald, M. “Smart Contract Dispute Resolution: The Inescapable Flaws of Blockchain-Based Arbitration”, University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 168, 2020.
Janssen, A. U., Vennmanns, T. “Smart Dispute Resolution in the Digital Age: The Potential of Smart Contract and Online Dispute Resolution for Dispute Prevention and Resolution in Consumer Law Cases”, Radboud University Nijmegen,
Joneidi, La’ya and Ayoub Mansouri Razi, “Nature and Effect of Multi-Tier Dispute Resolution Clauses in Contracts”, Private Law Research Quarterly, Volume 9, Issue 34, 2021. (in Persian)
Kafeza, I. “An Intelligent Mediation Platform for Smart Contracts in Blockchain”, Online faculty, University of Liverpool, Volume 3052, 2021, Available at: https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-3052/paper26.pdf, Last Seen: 16 July 2023.
Kaulartz, M. “Blockchain Arbitration”, 2023, Available at: https://youtu.be/N4jtK4HaKfQ, Last Seen: 1 July 2023.
Kazemi Jaliseh, Fariba, Atefeh Amini-Nia and Jamil Hassan-Pour, “From Electronic Dispute Resolution to Blockchain and Justice in Cryptographic Courts”, Comparative Legal Studies in Iran and International Law, Volume 14, Issue52, 2021. (in Persian)
Lesaege, C., Ast, F., George, W. “Kleros”, 2019. Available at: https://kleros.io/whitepaper.pdf, Last Seen: 6 July 2022.
Mania, K. “Online Dispute Resolution: The Future of Justice”, International Comparative Jurisprudence, 2015.
Mik, Eliza. “Smart Contracts: Terminology, Technical Limitations and Real World Complexity”, Law Innovation and Technology, 9 (2), 2017, Available at: https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/2341/, Last Seen: 30 June 2023.
Möslein, Florian. “Conflicts of Laws and Codes: Defining the Boundaries of Digital Jurisdictions”, Philipps-Universität Marburg, 2018, Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3174823, Last Seen: 1 August 2023.
R, McWaters, J. “The Future of Financial Infrastructure: An Ambitious Look at How Blockchain Can Reshape Financial Services”, World Economic Forum, 2016.
Rainy, D. “Smart Contract Panel Opening Comments”, International Journal on Online Dispute Resolution, 2, 2017.
Sadeghi, Mohsen and Mehdi Nasser, “Considerations for Legal Policy in Smart Contracts”, Iranian Journal of Public Policy, Volume 4, Issue 2, 2018. (in Persian)
Schmitz, A. “Online Dispute Resolution for Smart Contracts”, Journal of Dispute Resolution, Issue 8, 2019.
The World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), “WIPO Arbitration Rules”, Effective from July 1, 2021, Available at: https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/arbitration/rules/, Last Seen: 25 March 2022.
Karimi,S and mirhosseini,Y S . (2024). Dispute Resolution in Smart Contracts According to Their Self-executing Feature. Legal Research Quarterly, 27(3), 219-236. doi: 10.48308/jlr.2024.232840.2568
MLA
Karimi,S , and mirhosseini,Y S . "Dispute Resolution in Smart Contracts According to Their Self-executing Feature", Legal Research Quarterly, 27, 3, 2024, 219-236. doi: 10.48308/jlr.2024.232840.2568
HARVARD
Karimi S, mirhosseini Y S. (2024). 'Dispute Resolution in Smart Contracts According to Their Self-executing Feature', Legal Research Quarterly, 27(3), pp. 219-236. doi: 10.48308/jlr.2024.232840.2568
CHICAGO
S Karimi and Y S mirhosseini, "Dispute Resolution in Smart Contracts According to Their Self-executing Feature," Legal Research Quarterly, 27 3 (2024): 219-236, doi: 10.48308/jlr.2024.232840.2568
VANCOUVER
Karimi S, mirhosseini Y S. Dispute Resolution in Smart Contracts According to Their Self-executing Feature. Leg Res Q. 2024;27(3):219-236 (In Persian). doi: 10.48308/jlr.2024.232840.2568