Economic Analysis of Joint and Several Liability

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 University of Tehran

2 Phd gratuate

1048308/jlr.2022.224500.2038

Abstract

In the economic analysis of civil liability, efficiency, i.e wealth maximization is the basis for justifying rules. Civil liability by reducing administrative costs, distributing losses among members of society, forcing agents to internalize external costs of their activities and taking precautions to prevent accidents leads to a reduction in total accident costs and thus increase wealth and efficiency. In this essay, the rule of joint and several liability is examined with the approach of economic analysis and efficiency criteria, the results show that applying this rule, depending on whether multiple causes of the damage are aware of each other's solvency or not, and also depending on the nature of the accident, can have different effects that lead to efficiency in only a few cases: where multiple causes of damage are not aware about the solvency of each other, in both joint care accidents and successive care accidents, joint and several liability leads to efficiency through deterrence; where one of the multiple causes is solvent and the other is insolvent, and they are aware of this situation, the exercise of joint and several liability, in addition to leading to precaution and efficiency in joint care accidents, also reduces administrative costs and thereby leads to efficiency.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

  1. Books

    1. Calabresi, G., The Costs of Accidents:A Legal and Economic Analysis, Yale University Press, New Haven and London, 1970.
    2. Coleman, J., Risks and Wrongs, Cambridge Studies in Philosophy and Law, Cambridge University Press, first Published, 1992.
    3. Cooter, Robert & Ulen, Thomas, Law and Economics, 6th Ed, Addison Wesley Pub, 2016,
    4. Perry, S. R., Tort Law, In a Companion to Philosophy of Law and Legal Theory, Edited by Dennis Patterson, Blackwell Pub, 2000.

    Articles

    1. Faure, M.,"Attribution of Liability: An Economic Analysis of Various Cases", Chicago-Kent Law Review, Vol. 91, 2016, pp.603-635.
    2. Granelli, J.,"The Attack on Joint and Several Liability", ABA Journal, Vol. 71, No. 7, 1985, p.61-65.
    3. Hicks, K. T.,"The Case for Reform:An Economic Analysis of Joint and Several

    Liability after Comparative Negligence", Capital University Law Review, Vol. 17, No. 2, 1988, pp.187-204.

    1. Jacob, Julien & Lovat, Bruno,"Economic Analysis of Liability Apportionment Among Multiple Tortfeasors: A Survey, and Perspectives in Large-Scale Risks Management", Chicago-Kent Law Review, Vol. 91, 2016, pp.659- 683.
    2. Kornhauser, L. A.,"Economic analysis of joint and several liability", chapter 8 in Research Handbook on the Economics of Torts, Edited by Jennifer Arlen, Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, 2013, pp.199-233.
    3. Landes, William M. & Posner, Richard A,"Joint and Multiple Tortfeasors:An Economic Analysis", The Journal of Legal Studies, Vol. 9, No. 3, 1980, pp.517-555
    4. Morriss, Andrew P., Moorhouse, John C. & Whaples, Robert,"Law and Economics and Tort Law:A Survey of Scholarly Opinion", Albany Law Review, Vol. 62, 1998, pp.667-696.
    5. Oswald, L. J.,"Strict Liability of Individuals under CERCLA:A Normative Analysis", Boston College Environmental Affairs Law Review, Vol. 20,1993, pp.579-637.
    6. Lee, Han-Duck, Browne, Mark J. & Schmit, Joan T."How Does Joint and Several Tort Reform Affect the Rate of Tort Filings? Evidence from the State Courts", The Journal of Risk and Insurance, Vol. 61, No. 2, 1994, pp.295-316.
    7. Posner, R. A,"Utilitarianism, Economics, and Legal Theory", The Journal of Legal Studies, 8, No. 1, 1979, pp.103-140
    8. Sugarman, S. D."Doing Away with Tort Law", California Law Review, Vol. 73, 1985, pp.555-664.

    Site

    1. Zhou, Qi, The Evolution of Efficiency Principle: From Utilitarianism to Wealth Maximization, SSRN Electronic Journal, available at https://ssrn.com/abstract=870748 (last visited on 06/02 /2021),

     

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 06 November 2021
  • Revise Date: 19 April 2022
  • Accept Date: 03 May 2022

Share

How to cite

Statistics