The “Right of Control” under “Rotterdam Rules”; A Comparative Study with other Conventions on Carriage of Goods and Domestic Laws

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Professor of private Law, Department of Law, Payame Noor University (PNU), Tehran, Iran

2 Assistant Professor of private Law, Department of Private Law, Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran, Iran

3 Ph.D. in Private Law, Payame Noor University (PNU), Tehran, Iran

10.29252/jlr.2021.220893.1859

Abstract

Nowadays, the continued control and domination of the seller or other stakeholders over the goods in transit is one of the needs of the International Trade. This control can include a wide range from determining the environmental conditions of the cargo to changing the consignee of the cargo and the place of delivery, or even preventing the delivery and returning the goods. Although the rights and obligations of the seller and the buyer is studied within the framework of the law of International sale of the goods, but since the context of this control coincides with the shipment of cargo through the carrier, the rights and duties of the shipper (seller) and the carrier should also be considered in terms of International Transport Law. In some related conventions on carriage of goods, there are relatively similar contexts as the “Right of disposition of cargo” but a comparative study shows that a full and up-to-date example of it as the "Right of Control" is provided within Rotterdam Rules 2009.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

  1. Book

    1. Clarke, M, International Carriage of Goods by Road: CMR, Oxon: Informa Law from Routledge, 2014.

    Articel

    1. Alba, M, “Electronic Commerce Provisions in the UNCITRAL Convention on Contracts for the International Carriage of Goods Wholly or Partly by Sea”, Texas International Law Journal, 44, 2009, pp.387-416.
    2. Bal, A, “A critical evaluation of the Rotterdam Rules: selected issues in perspective”, WMU Research Report Series, World Maritime University, No. 2. 2009, pp.1-143.
    3. Berlingieri, F, “An Analysis of Two Recent Commentaries of the Rotterdam Rules”, Diritto Marittimo: Quarterly Journal of Italian and Foreign Doctrine Jurisprudence and Legislation, Fasc. I, 2012, pp. 1-112.
    4. Bovio, D, “Ocean Carriers’ Duty of Care to Cargo in Port: The Rotterdam Rules of 2009”, Fordham International Law Journal, Volume 32, Issue 4, Article 4, 2008, pp. 1162-1208.
    5. Pejović, Č, “Article 47(2) of the Rotterdam rules: Solution of old problems or a new confusion?”, Poredbeno Pomorsko Pravo, Vol. 52, No.167, 2013. pp. 81-103.
    6. Ziegler, A, “Rotterdam Rules And The Underlying Sales Contract”, CMI Yearbook, 2013, pp. 273-286.
    7. Ziel, G, “Rights of the Controlling Party”, Chapter 10, The United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Carriage of Goods Wholly or Partly by Sea, An Appraisal Of The Rotterdam Rules, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg: Berlin, 2011, pp. 249-263.

    Thesis

    1. Besong, Christine, “Towards a Modern Role for Liability in Multimodal Transport Law”, A Thesis for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy, University of London, 2007.

     

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 28 February 2021
  • Accept Date: 27 November 2021

Share

How to cite

Statistics