مطالعه تطبیقی مفهوم و ماهیت حق انتساب اثر ادبی و هنری در نظام‌های حقوقی

نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی

نویسنده

استادیار دانشکده حقوق، گروه حقوق مالکیت فکری، دانشگاه قم.

چکیده

« حق انتساب اثر به پدیدآورنده آن» یکی از مهم‌ترین جنبههای حقوق اخلاقی یا معنوی پدیدآورندگان آثار فکری است که در اغلب زیر شاخه­های حقوق مالکیت فکری مطرح بوده و مورد حمایت قوانین بین‌المللی نظیر کنوانسیون برن و قانون­گذاران بسیاری از کشورها قرار گرفته است. با وجود این، نسبت به ابعاد مفهومی و ماهیتی و قلمرو آن، بین نظام‌های مختلف حقوقی  ابهامات و اختلافات زیادی به چشم می‌خورد. پژوهش حاضر بعد از بررسی موضوعات مربوط به چگونگی نام‌گذاری این حق در قوانین کشورها و تاریخچه آن، با تفکیک ابعاد سلبی (همچون حق ممانعت، حق گسستگی و حق انکار) و اثباتی(نظیر حق افشای نام واقعی، مستعار و بی نام)  این حق، جنبههای مختلف هر کدام از آن‌ها را به  تفصیل مورد بررسی تطبیقی قرار داده است. به علاوه مصادیق حق مزبور و استثنائات آن در قوانین کشورها و نیز قوانین حقوق مالکیت فکری ایران  در این تحقیق به دقت موشکافی شده است.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

.

نویسنده [English]

  • S.H Shabiri
Australia Copyright Act 1968 (consolidated as of June 27, 2015)

Brasil Law on Copyright and Neighboring Rights No. 9,610 of 1998.

Carlos Ferna´ ndez-Molina and Eduardo Peis, The Moral Rights of Authors in the Age of Digital Information , Departamento de Biblioteconomia y Documentacion, Universidad de Granada, Colegio Ma´ ximo de Cartuja, 2001.

Carroll, Michael, Whose Ownership Is It Anyway?: How We Came to View Musical Expression as a Form of Property, 72 U. CIN. L. REV. 2004.

Chambers, J.A. , Relating Personality and Biographical Factors to Scientific Creativity, 78 PSYCHOL. MONOGRAPHS: GEN. & APP. 1, 6,1964.

Constantinou, Jennifer , A Brief Overview of The Visual Artists Rights Act of 1990 (VARA), Seton Hall School of Law, 2007.

Copyright Law of the People’s Republic of China ( September 7, 1990 as amended in February 26, 2010).

Cotter, Thomas, Pragmatism, Economics, and the Droit Moral, North Carolina Law Review, 1997.

Dreier, Thomas, Concise European copyright law, Kluwer Law International, 2006.

Egypt Law on the Protection of Intellectual Property Rights 82 of 2002

Ellis v. Hurst, 128 N.Y.S. 144 (Sup. Ct. 1910).

France Intellectual Property Code (consolidated version of October 9, 2016).

Germany Act on Copyright and Related Rights (as amended up to Act of April 4, 2016)

Ginsburg, Jane C. , The Author's Name as a Trademark: A Perverse Perspective on the Moral Right of 'Paternity'?, Columbia Law School, 2005.

Ginsburg, Jane, The Right to Claim Authorship in U.S. Copyright and Trademarks Law, 41 HOUS. L. REV. 263, 264 , 2004.

Goldstein, Paul International Copyright: Principles, Law, and Practice, Oxford University Press, 2005.

Greece Law on Copyright, Related Rights and Cultural Matters(2121/1993).

Guinea Act on Copyright and Neighboring Rights (No. 043/APN/CP of August 9, 1980)

Hohfeld, Wesley Newcomb, Fundamental Legal Conceptions as Applied in Judicial Reasoning, Yale University Press 1923.

Hungary Act No. LXXVI of 1999 on Copyright.

Iceland Copyright Act 1972( No. 73 of May 29, 1972, as last amended by Act No. 97 of 30 June 2006)

Italian copyright law 1941( "Protezione del diritto d'autore e di altri diritti connessi al suo esercizio" Law no 633 of 22 April 1941)

Japan Copyright Act (Act No. 48 of May 6, 1970, as amended up to Act No. 35 of May 14, 2014)

Kamina, Pascal, Film Copyright in the European Union, Cambridge University Press, 2002.

Kowalski, W. W. , International Legal Dimensions of Art and Cultural Property: A Comparative Law Analysis of the Retained Rights of Artists, 38 VAND. J. TRANSNAT’L L. 1141, 1148 , 2005.

Kwall, Roberta Rosenthal, The Attribution Right in the United States: Caught in the Crossfire Between Copyright and Section 43(A), Washington Law Review, October, 2002.

Kwall, Roberta Rosenthal, The soul of creativity: forging a moral rights law for the United States, Stanford University Press, 2010.

Lastowka, Greg, Digital Attribution: Copyright and the Right to Credit, 87 B.U. L. REV. 41, 70 2007.

Liemer, Susan, How We Lost Our Moral Rights and the Door Closed on Non-Economic Values in Copyright, Southern Illinois University Carbondale, 2005.

Millar v. Taylor (1769) 98 Eng. Rep. 201, 252 (K.B.).

Mireille M. M. van Eechoud, Mireille Van Eechoud, Harmonizing European copyright law: the challenges of better lawmaking, Kluwer Law International, 2009.

Morita v. Omni Publ'ns. Int'l Ltd., 741 F. Supp. 1107, 1114 (S.D.N.Y. 1990).

NIMMER, MELVILLE & NIMMER , DAVID, NIMMER ON COPYRIGHT § 8D.01[A] 2007.

Nuno Pires de Carvalho, The TRIPS regime of patent rights, Kluwer Law International, 2010.

Patterson, Lyman Ray, Copyright in Historical Perspective, Vanderbilt University Press, 1968.

Pierce, Jon L., The State of Psychological Ownership, 7 REV. GEN. PSYCHOL. 84, 85-86, 2003.

Papua New Guinea Copyright and Neighbouring Rights Act 2000.

Poland Act on Copyright and Neighboring Rights (No. 83 of February 4, 1994 as amended up to October 21, 2010)

Rigamonti, Cyrill, Deconstructing Moral Rights, 47 Harv. Int'l L. J. 353, 2006.

Republic of Korea Copyright Act of 1957 (Act No. 432 of January 28, 1957, as amended up to Act No. 5015 of December 6, 1995)

Roberta Rosenthal Kwall, The Attribution Right in the United States: Caught in the Crossfire Between Copyright and Section 43(A), Washington Law Review, October, 2002

Rossman, Joseph, Industrial creativity; the psychology of the inventor, University Books, 1964.

Russian Federation Copyright 2006( as codified in part IV of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation and entered in force on January 1, 2008).

Self III Henry,, Moral Rights and Musicians in the United States," 2003-2004 Entertainment, Publishing and the Arts Handbook 165, 2003.

Samoa Copyright Act 1998 (as consolidated in 2011)

Spain Law on Intellectual Property ( No 1/1996 of April 12, 1996)

Shaw, Ralph, Copyright and the Right to Credit, 113 SCIENCE 571, 752 , 1951.

Shaw, Steven A. Not That There’s Anything Wrong With That: Jessica Seinfeld’s Cookbook Is Unoriginal, But

Slovakia Copyright and Related Rights Act No. 185/2015

Suhl, Natalie, Moral Rights Protection in the United States Under the Berne Convention: A Fictional Work?, 12 ORDHAM INTELL. PROP. MEDIA & ENT. L.J. 1203, 1206, 2002.

Swack, Cheryl, Safeguarding Artistic Creation and the Cultural Heritage: A Comparison of Droit Moral Between France and the United States, 22 COLUM.-VLA J.L. & ARTS, 1998.

Tunisia Law on Literary and Artistic Property(Law No. 94-36 of February 24, 1994).

Tushnet, Rebecca, Naming Rights: Attribution and Law, Georgetown University Law Center, November 2007

UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988

USA Copyright Act of 1976.

Widow Vergne v. Creditors of Mr. Vergne, Cour d’appel [CA] [regional court of appeal] Paris, le ch., Jan. 11, 1828, S. Jur. II 1828, 5.

WIPO Performances and Phonograms Treaty 1996.

Zabatta, Patrick, Moral Rights And Musical Works: Are Composers Getting Berned?, 43 SYRACUSE L. REV. 1095 , 1992.

Zhonglin, He, Author's Moral Rights in UK and China, Law Department, School of African and Oriental Studies, University of London, 2002.

شبیری، سید حسن و همکاران، کتاب پیش نویس لایحه قانون جامع حمایت از حقوق مالکیت ادبی و هنری و حقوق مرتبط، ناشر دبیرخانه شورای عالی اطلاع رسانی،1389.

علیرضا، نوروزی، حقوق مالکیت فکری، نشر چاپار، 1385.

کلود کلمبه، اصول بنیادین حقوق مؤلف و حقوق مجاور در جهان، ترجمه علی رضا محمدزاده وادقانی، نشر میزان، 1385.