Determination of the Law Applicable to Bill of lading by the Courts of England and Iran

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Assistant Professor at Shahid Beheshti University

2 International commercial law, Shahid Beheshti university, Tehran, Iran

10.22034/jlr.2020.185242.1695

Abstract

Lawyers disagree about application of the Rome I to bill of lading .Under English Law, the law applicable is determined according to common law rules in case bills of lading are excluded from the Rome I.Both the Rome I and common law rules recognize the principle of freedom of parties.However, the principle of freedom of parties is restricted under the Hague-Visby Rules and the parties' choice of law could not lessen the liability of the carrier from what provided under the Hague-Visby.Under Iranian Law, the law of the place of conclusion of contract applies to the bills of lading unless the contracting parties are foreign nationals and have subjected their contract to another law.Nevertheless,, considering the restrictions upon the application of foreign law, in accordance with Hague rules to which Iran is a party, parties to a bill of lading issued in a contracting state cannot agree on application of law of other countries which would lessen the liability of carrier from what provided under the Hague Rules.
Bill of lading might contain an incorporation clause which incorporates charterparty clauses into bill of lading.Under English Law, the law applicable to the choice of law clause incorporated into bills of lading by reference is the law that is applicable in case of validity of incorporation clause.In Iranian legal system, there is no conflict of laws rule regarding the applicable law to the choice of law clause and courts in each case will seek to discover parties' true intentions.

Keywords

References

الف) منابع فارسی کتاب 1 .امامی، سید حسن، حقوق مدنی، جلد 4 ،کتاب فروشی اسلامیه، 1340 . 2 .پورنوری، منصور، حقوق دریایی در دادگاه دریایی، مهد حقوق، 1383. 3 .کاتوزیان، ناصر، قانون مدنی در نظم حقوقی کنونی، میزان، 1391. 4 .الماسی، نجادعلی، تعارض قوانین، نشر دانشگاهی، 1391. مقاله 5 .اربابی، مسعود و نوید حاتمی پور، ارجاع بارنامة دریـایی بـه شـروط قـرارداد اجـارة کشتی؛ در جستجوی قصد طرفین، مطالعات حقوق تطبیقی، دوره 10 ،1398 ،شماره 1. 6 .اربابی، مسعود و نوید حاتمی پور، مطالعـه تطبیقـی کارکردهـا و نقـش قـراردادی بارنامه دریایی در حقوق ایران و انگلستان، دوره 20 ،1396 ،شماره 79. 7 .سیفی، سید جمال، قانون داوری تجاری بینالمللی ایران همسو با قـانون نمونـه داوری آنسیترال، مجله حقوقی بین المللی، 1377 ،شماره 23. 8 .مافی، همایون و محمد حسین تقی پور، قانون قابل اعمال بر تعهدات قـراردادی در اتحادیه اروپا و آمریکا، فصلنامه پژوهش حقوق خصوصی،1394 ،شماره 13. 9 .نیکبخت، حمیدرضا، تعـارض قـوانین در قراردادها(قـانون حـاکم بـر تعهـدات قراردادی و اصل حاکمیت اراده)، حقوقی بینالمللی،1384 ،شماره 32. 10 .نیکبخت، حمیدرضا، ماده 968 قانون مـدنی و مـاده 27 قـانون داوری تجـاری بینالمللی، تحقیقات حقوقی، 1379 ،شماره 31 و 32. 11 .نیکبخت، حمیدرضا، محدودیتهای اعمال قانون خارجی در تعارض قوانین، مجله تحقیقات حقوقی، 1385 ،شماره 44. فصلنامه تحقیقات حقوقی شماره 92 تعیین قانون حاکم بر بارنامه دریایی توسط... 244 ب) منابع انگلیسی Books 12.Aikens, Richard, Lord, Richard and Bools, Michael, Bills of Lading, London: Informa Law from Routledge, 2nd ed, 2016. 13.Baatz, Yvonne, Maritime Law, Informa Law from Routledge, 4th ed., 2018. 14.Baughen, Simon, Shipping Law, Routledge, 7 ed., 2018. 15.Briggs, Adrian, The Conflict of Laws, Oxford University Press, 4th ed., 2019, p. 195. 16.Collins, L.A. et al, Dicey, Morris & Collins on the Conflict of Laws, Sweet & Maxwell, 2012. 17.Giermann, Heiko A., The Evidentiary Value of Bills of Lading and Estoppel (Schriften sum Seehandelsrecht), Lit Verlag, 2004. 18.Ozdel, Melis, Bills of Lading Incorporating Charterparties, HART publishing, 2015. 19.Shmittof, Clive M., Schmithoff's Selected Essays on International Trade Law, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1988. 20.T.M.C Asser Institute, Hague-Zagreb essays 2: product liability, road transport, foreign law: Hague-Zagreb Colloquium on the Law of International Trade, Hague session 1976, Brill, 1978. 21.Todd, Paul, Principles of the carriage of goods by sea, Routledge, 2016. 22.Treitel Guenter H and Reynolds, Francis M. B., Carver on Bills of Lading, London: Sweett and Maxwell, third ed., 2011. 23.Treitel, Guenter H., The Law of Contract, Sweet and Maxwell, 11th ed., 2003. 24.Wilson, John F., Carriage of Goods by Sea, London: Longman, 7th ed., 2010. Articles 25.Alison, Simon, ‘Choice of Law and Forum Clauses in Shipping Documents – Revising Section 11 of the Carriage of Goods by Sea Act 1991 (CTH)’, Monash University Law Review, Vol. 40, Issue 3, 2015. 26.Babic, Davor, ‘Rome I Regulation: bindng authority for arbitral tribunal in the European Union?’, Journal of Private International Law, Vol. 13, No. 1, 2017. فصلنامه تحقیقات حقوقی شماره 92 تعیین قانون حاکم بر بارنامه دریایی توسط... 245 27.Juenger, Friedrich K., ‘The Lex Mercatoria and Private International Law’, Louisiana Law Review, Vol. 60, No. 4, 2000. 28.Mayer, Pierre, ‘Conflicting Decisions in International Commercial Arbitration’, Journal of International Dispute Settlement, Vol. 4, No. 2, 2013. 29.Whitman, Robert, ‘Incorporation by Reference in Commercial Contracts’, Maryland Law Review, vol. 21(1), 1961. 30.Zekos, G.I., ‘Conflict of Laws and the contractual role of bills of lading’, Managerial Law, Vol. 40, Issue 3, 1998. Case/ Document/ Report 31.Amin Rasheed Shipping Corporation v Kuwait Insurance Co. [1983] 2 Lloyd's Rep 365, 369 (HL) 32.Erik Rosaeg paper at Colloquium on Maritime Conflict of Laws held at Southampton, 2010 (As cited in Baatz, Yvonne and others, C.I.F. and F.O.B Contracts, Sweet & Maxwell, fifth ed., 2012). 33.Giuliano, M. and Lagarde, P., Report on the Convention on the law applicable to contractual obligations No C 282, 1980. 34.The Travaux Preparatoires of the Hague Rules and of the Hague-Visby Rules, Comite Maritime International, 1997. 35.The Channel Ranger [2014] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 337. 36.The Epsilon Rosa [2002] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 701. 37.The Morviken v Owners of Hollandia [1983] 1 AC 565.
Legal Research Quarterly
Volume 23, Issue 92
March 2021
Pages 223-247

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 12 August 2020
  • Revise Date: 26 October 2020
  • Accept Date: 01 November 2020

Share

How to cite

Statistics