حق مشارکت کودکان در فرآیند پناهندگی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استاد، دانشکده حقوق، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران

2 دکتری، دانشکده حقوق، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران ایمیل نویسنده مسئول: a_azarpendar@sbu.ac.ir

چکیده

کودکان در رویه‌های پناهندگی بسیار آسیب‌پذیر هستند. این وضعیت آسیب‌پذیری ایجاب می‌کند تا حقوق موثری برای ایشان در این رویه‌ها لحاظ نمود. برای این منظور، حق مشارکت می‌تواند موقعیت حقوقی این کودکان را تقویت کرده، آنان را از یک شیء منفعل به یک کارگزار فعال و دارنده حق تبدیل نماید. بااین‌حال سوالی که مطرح می‌شود این است که حق مشارکت کودک چه مصادیقی دارد و باید چگونه اعمال شود تا بتواند در جهت ایفای حقوق او باشد؟ به نظر می‌آید حقوق کودک در رویه‌های پناهندگی صرفاً زمانی به‌طور کامل استیفا می‌شود که کودک از حق مشارکت به‌طور صحیح برخوردار باشد، در این راستا اسناد حقوقی مرتبط به حق مشارکت کودک در رویه‌های پناهندگی مورد تحلیل قرار می‌گیرند؛ پس‌از‌آن و ازآنجاکه کودک هنوز به بلوغ ذهنی کافی نرسیده تا بتواند در کلیه رویه‌های پناهندگی از حق مشارکت استفاده کند، رابطه میان این حق و اصل مصالح عالیه او بررسی می‌گردد. درنهایت مشخص می‌شود، حق مشارکت صرفاً هنگامی در جهت ایفای حقوق کودک کاربری دارد که کلیه مصادیق آن به‌صورت صحیح اِعمال شده باشند و اگر چنین شود، حق مشارکت کودک هم‌جهت با مصالح عالیه عمل خواهد کرد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Children's Right to Participate in Asylum Procedure

نویسندگان [English]

  • ebrahim beigzadeh 1
  • Ahmadreza Azarpendar 2
1 Professor of Law, Faculty of Law, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran.
2 Ph.D., Faculty of Law, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran Corresponding Author Email: a_azarpendar@sbu.ac.ir
چکیده [English]

Children are very vulnerable in asylum procedure. This vulnerable situation requires the inclusion of effective rights for them in asylum procedure. For this purpose, the right to participate can strengthen the legal position of these children and transform them from passive objects to active agents and rights holders. However, the question that arises is, what are the examples of the child’s rights to participate and how should the right of participation be applied so that it can fulfill the rights of the child? It seems that the rights of the child in asylum procedure are fully satisfied only when the child has the right to participate correctly; in this regard, legal documents related to the child’s right to participate in asylum procedure are analyzed; After that, and since the child has not yet reached maturity to be able to use the right to participate in all asylum procedure, the relationship between this right and the principle of the his/her best interests is examined. Finally, it is clear that the right to participate only acts in the direction of fulfilling the rights of the child when all its elements are correctly applied, and if this happens, the child's right to participate will work in the direction of the best interests.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • child'
  • s rights
  • right to participate
  • best interests of the child
  • the asylum procedures

مراجع

  1. Books

    1. Crock, E. Justice for the Migrant Child: The Protective Force of the Convention on the Rights of the Child, In: Mahmoudi, Said., Pernilla, Leviner., Anna, Kaldal and Katrin, Lainpelto (Editors). Child-friendly Justice: A Quarter of a Century of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, Brill Nijhoff, 2015.
    2. Daly, A. Children, Autonomy and the Courts. Beyond the Right to be Heard, Leiden: Brill Nijhoff, 2017.
    3. Lansdown, G. The Evolving Capacities of the Child, Florence, UNICEF Innocenti Research Centre, 2005.
    4. Mannion, K. Child Migration Matters. Children and Young People’s Experiences of Migration, Dublin: Immigrant Council of Ireland, 2016.
    5. Pobjoy, J. M. The Child in International Refugee Law, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.
    6. Rap, Stephanie. Participation of Children in Asylum Procedures, In: Klaassen, M., Rap, , Rodrigues, P., and Liefaard, T. (Editors). Safeguarding Children’s Rights in International Law, Intersentia, 2020.
    7. Smyth, C. The Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights relevant to child migrants, In: Bhabha, J., Jyothi, Kanics and Daniel, Senovilla (Editors). Research Handbook on child Migration, Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, 2018.

    Articles

    1. Bijleveld, G. V. B., et al., “Children’s and Young People’s Participation within Child Welfare and Child Protection Services: A State-of-the-art Review”, Child and Family Social Work ,20, 2015.
    2. Collins, T. M. “A Child’s Right to Participate: Implications for International Child Protection”, The International Journal of Human Rights,21 (1),
    3. Darmanaki, Farahani, L. and Graham, L. “The Role of Psychosocial Resources in the Adjustment of Migrant Adolescents”, Journal of the Pacific Rim Psychology, 12 (e3), 2018.
    4. Doek, J. E. “The eighteenth birthday of the Convention on the Rights of the child: Achievements and Challenges”, University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform, 41 (1), 2017.
    5. Hanson, K. “Children’s Participation and Agency when They Don’t Do the Right Thing”, Childhood, 23 (4), 2016.
    6. Kalverboer, Margrite., et al. “Unaccompanied Minors in the Netherland and the Care Facility in Which they Flourish Best”, Child and Family Social Work, 2016.
    7. Kennan, D., et al. “Supporting Children’s Participation in Decision-Making: A Systematic Literature Review Exploring Effectiveness of Participatory Processes”, British Journal of Social Work,
    8. Kohli, R. “The Sound of Silence: Listening to What Unaccompanied Asylum-seeking Children Say and Do Not Say”, British Journal of Social Work, 36,
    9. Lamb, M. E., et al. “Children’s Testimony: A handbook of psychological research and forensic practice”, Child and Family Social Work, 8 (1), 2011.
    10. Leviner, P. “Child Participation in the Swedish Child Protection System”, International Journal of Children’s Rights, 2 (1),
    11. Liefaard, T. “Access to Justice for Children: Towards a Specific Research and Implementation Agenda”, International Journal of Children’s Rights, 27,
    12. Liefaard, T. “Child-friendly Justice: Protection and Participation of Children in the Justice System”, Temple Law Review, 88 (4), 2016.
    13. Lundy, L. “Voice is not Enough: Conceptualising Article 12 of United Nation Convention on the Rights of the Child”, British Educational Research Journal, 33 (6), 2007.
    14. Muench, K. et al., “Children and Parent Participation in Child Protection Conferences: A Study in One English Local Authority”, Child Care in Practice, 23 (1), 2017.
    15. Muftee, M. “Children’s Agency in Resettlement: A Study of Swedish Cultural Orientation Programs in Kenya and Sudan”, Children’s Geographies, 13 (2), 2015.
    16. Quas, J. A., and Gail, S. G. “Consequence of Criminal Court Involvement of Child Victims”, Psychology, Public Policy and Law,18 (3), 2012.
    17. Reilly, L. and Pat, D., “The Role of Social Work Education and Training in Supporting Practitioners to Communicate with Children in an Age-Appropriate Manner”, British Journal of Social Work, 47,
    18. Stalford, H. “David and Goliath: Due Weight, the State and Determining Unaccompanied Children’s Fate”, Immigration, Asylum and Nationality Law, 32, 2018.
    19. Tobin, J. “Justifying Children’s Rights”, International Journal of Children’s Rights, 21 (3), 2013.

    Documents and Judgments

    1. Council of Europe, Council of Europe Action Plan on Protecting Refugee and Migrant Children in Europe (2017-2019), Strasbourg: Council of Europe, 2017.
    2. Council of Europe, Council of Europe Strategy for the Rights of the child (2016-2021), Strasbourg: Council of Europe, 2016.
    3. CRC Committee, Concluding Observation of France, 23 February 2016, CRC/C/FRA/CO/5, 2016.
    4. CRC Committee, General Comment No.12, CRC/C/GC/12, 2009.
    5. CRC Committee, General Comment No.5, 27 November 2003, CRC/C/GC/2003/5, 2003.
    6. CRC Committee, General Comment No.6, CRC/GC/2005/6, 2005.
    7. CRC Committee, Initial State Party Report: India, CRC/C/28/Add.10, 1997.
    8. CRC Committee, Initial State Party Report: Malawi, CRC/C/8/Add.43, 2001.
    9. CRC Committee, Joint general comment No.4 of the Committee on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of Their Families and No.23 of the Committee on the Rights of the Child, CMW/C/GC/4-CRC/C/GC/23, 2017.
    10. ECtHR, Abdullahi Elmi aand Aweys Abubakar Vs Malta, Applications Nos 25794/13 & 28151/13, 22 November 2016.
    11. ECtHR, C.E. Vs Belgium, 27 September 2018, CRC/C/79/D/12/2017, 2018.
    12. ECtHR, M&M Vs Croatia Application No. 10161/13, 2015.
    13. ECtHR, Muskhadzhiyeva & others Vs Belgium, Application No.41442/07, Judgment of 19 January 2010.
    14. ECtHR, Rahimi Vs Greece Application No 8687/08, 5 April 2011.
    15. ECtHR, S.C. Vs the United Kingdom Application No 60958/00, 2004.
    16. ECtHR, Tarakhel vs. Switzerland, Application No.29217.12, Judgment of 4 November 2014.
    17. European Commission, Communication to the European Parliament and the Council on the protection of children in migration, COM 2011 final, Brussels, 2017.
    18. UN Human Rights Council, Access to justice for Children, Report of the United Nation High Commissioner for Human Rights, UN Doc. A/HRC/25/35, 2013.
    19. UNHCR, A Framework for the Protection of Children, Geneva, UNHCR, 2006.
    20. UNHCR, A Framework for the Protection of Children, Geneva: UNHCR, 2012.
    21. UNHCR, UNHCR Best Interests Procedure Guidelines: Assessing and Determining the Best Interests of the Child, Geneva, UNHCR, 2021.
    22. UNHCR/UNICEF, Safe & Sound, What States can do to Ensure Respect for the Best Interests of Unaccompanied and Separated Children in Europe, UNHCR/UNICEF, 2014.
    23. UNICEF, Child Displacement, 2022, Available at: https://data.unicef.org/topic/child-migration-and-displacement/displacment.

فایل ها

سابقه مقاله

  • تاریخ دریافت: 01 آبان 1402
  • تاریخ بازنگری: 23 بهمن 1402
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 28 بهمن 1402

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار