نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانشکده حقوق دانشگاه شهید بهشتی
2 دانشیار، گروه حقوق بین الملل عمومی دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران.
3 استادیار، گروه حقوق عمومی دانشگاه تهران، پردیس فارابی، قم، ایران.
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
This research examines the paradigm of traditional Iranian governance, focusing on the Qajar period (Nasserite era). The main question of the research is what are the characteristics of the power and governance structure in Iran during the Qajar period and how can it be analyzed in the form of a coherent model? The research method is based on historical-comparative analysis, which uses primary and secondary sources, and an analytical-descriptive approach, to conceptually reconstruct the power structure in this period. Using the concept of "paradigm", the article analyzes the most important dominant paradigm of the Qajar period in three main aspects:
Iranian tyranny: Based on Weber's patrimonial theories and Marx-Wittfogel's oriental tyranny, including the components of hereditary rule, the lack of the concept of public interest, the lack of separation of public and private affairs, the ownership relationship between the king and the people, and unstructured power.
The Integration of Religion and Politics: An examination of dual legitimacy, the religious-political status of scholars, the mechanisms of interaction between religion and politics, and the role of religion as a legitimizing factor.
The tribal monarchy system: including the geographical distribution of power, the hierarchical system, a specific political economy, military power, dual legitimacy, and relations with foreign states.
This study shows that some fundamental elements of this three-faceted paradigm can still be traced in the contemporary Iranian political system, which reveals the importance of understanding this paradigm for understanding the challenges of contemporary governance.
کلیدواژهها [English]
)