عنوان مقاله [English]
The university is a symbol of moderizing in the field of formal education and relies on levels of independence, which manifests itself in the areas of property acquisition, intra-organizational pursuit of staff and students. On the other hand, judicial officers have to go to the university or its affiliated institutions, to ensure public safety in the form of detecting or preserving a crime, prosecuting defendants or criminals, or enforcing laws such as traffic.
The main question is whether the independence of the university and the need to guarantee its freedom change the way public security is ensured, and therefore the scope of authority of officers is limited or conditional, or whether their authority in the university camuses Is it absolute? Are there different criteria for entering the officers to perform the usual duties or to pursue the opponents? The present study, through a library study, with a descriptive and analytical method and an insightful study of criminal and public law, stating the historical developments of this debate, the strategies of the Islamic Assembly and the government in this regard and how to establish a balance between security and It has proposed and evaluated freedom in universities. In sum, the lack of specification of the university's privileges over security in the legal texts has led to the absolute presumption of the authority of the officers over the university and the originality of power over the security of the university and its functions.