نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی دانشگاه تهران
2 استان چهارمحال و بختیاری- فرخ شهر- خ فداییان اسلام. ک 34. پ 1 منزل شهباز 09169377478
3 کارشناس معاونت حقوقی ریاست جمهوری
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
The legislator, in 2008 embarked on amendment of Article 34 of Registration Code and made a series of changes on the sale of mortgaged property. But alongside of the advantages these amendments, there still are some defects and vaguenesses: Firstly, the text of Note 1 of the Article, at least in apparent, comes to mind that the enforcement of each mortgage contract must be performed by the interference of public authority and official formalities, while this duty, concerning the small and petty contracts, does not look logical. Secondly, the mentioned Article has not anticipate for some of the measures of pawnee after the infraction of debtor to pay debt, any period. This has caused the process of enforcement with ambiguity and it is probable in some circumstances, culminates in the debtor's denial of justice. In this paper, the authors, while explaining the above objections, try to offer the ways to solution of the problems.
کلیدواژهها [English]
)