نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 حقوق و علوم سیاسی دانشگاه تهران
2 گروه حقوق خصوصی دانشکده حقوق دانشگاه تهران
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
Contracts, as the most important tool for resource allocation and distribution of economic values, have always had gaps and contractual silence because of some reasons such as rational constraints, transaction costs and information asymmetry. Contractual parties’ disagreement on how to complete these gaps has led to many lawsuits, which have required judicial bodies and judges to complete or interpret the contracts. Among many different approaches (schools of thought) which attempts to complete or interpret contracts, economic analysis of law, which is generated from the synthesis between law and economics, focuses on completing contractual silence based on increasing efficiency, optimism and avoiding opportunistic behaviors. In addition to judges benefiting from the fundamentals and implementing tools of economic analysis approach, this approach and its effects on interpreting and completing contracts during court procedure needs to become a state of mind for the judge when issuing awards based on efficiency and optimism. Reducing court procedure costs, issuing pioneers awards based on judicial justice and efficient allocation of resources and contractual risks are only some of the prominent effects of economic analysis of law approach. Scrutinizing the Iran’s law system shows that in spite of exciting limitations and burdens, the condition for implementing and benefiting from this approach has been presented in the judicial procedure and there are evidences available regarding this subject matter. Also there is a vital requirement to design efficient default ruled due to manage and judge efficiently.
کلیدواژهها [English]
فهرست منابع
منابع فارسی
الف) کتب
ب) مقالات
ج) پایاننامه
منابع انگلیسی:
1.Chubb, Larry, Economic Analysis in the Courts: Limits and Constraints Indiana University School of Law,1989,p.795.
2.Cheshire, Fiffot and Furmstone, Micheal, Law of Contract, Oxford University Press,1991.
3.Hesselink, Martin, The Principle of European Contract Law: Some Choices Made by the Lando Commision, Global Jurist Frontiers, 2001.
4.Jasiak, Mikolaj, Selected issues on economic analysis of contract interpretation, PSEAP working paper, Polish association of law and economics,2007.
5.Kaplan, Lewis, Experts in the Courthouse: Problems and Opportunities, 2006, COLUMBIA BUSINESS LAW REVIEW 247,p. 254.
6.Latin American Competition Forum, The Role of Economic Analysis in Judicial Decisions, Note by the United States ,10-11 September 2008, p.4.
7.Lord Steyn,Contract Law and the Reasonable Expectations of Honest Men ,1997,113 L.Q.R. 433.
8.MCohen, Grorge, Implied Terms and Interpretation in Contract Law, Encyclopedia of Law and Economics, 1999.
11.Posner, Richard, Statutory interpretation in classroom and courtroom, University of Chicago Law Rev,1983.
12.Scott, Robert E & Triantis, George G, Incomplete Contracts and the Theory of Contract Design, 2005.
)