Characterization of International Crimes as Official or Personal Acts in Case Law and International Law Commission's` Approach

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Law, Faculty of Humanities,Bu-Ali Sina University,Hamedan,Iran

2 Law ,faculty of Bu-Ali Sina University,, Hamedan. Iran

10.29252/jlr.2021.221138.1875

Abstract

Of particular importance is the description of international crimes committed by state officials in order to enjoy immunity from foreign criminal courts. With the exception of the three state senior officials known as Troika officials, other officials during their term of office and Troika officials after their term of office may be prosecuted for the commission of international crimes under the heading of universal jurisdiction prosecuted by foreign criminal courts. In accordance with the rules of customary international law referred to and stressed by the International Law Commission in the so-called Plan for " immunity of officials from foreign criminal jurisdiction", state officials enjoy immunity from legal proceedings. Some courts have described the commission of international crimes as a personal act in order to avoid impunity for these officials, even if they took place officially. The authors of the article start from the hypothesis that, in order to avoid problems related to the flight of states from international responsibility, it is necessary that the commission of international crimes by officials be qualified as a official act and in this respect the exercise of immunity is excluded. This hypothesis that is supported by the International Law Commission and the case law of some courts.

Keywords

References

  1.  

    1. Books

     

     

    1. Damagaard, C., Individual Criminal Responsibility for Core International Crimes, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2008.
    2. Otto, Triffterer and Kai Ambos. The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: A Commentary, Beck & Hart, 3rd ed, 2016.
    3. Yearbook of the International Law Commission, Vol. I, 1972.

     

    1. Articles

     

    1. Akande, D., “International law Immunities and International Criminal law”, 98 AJIL, 2004, pp. 407-433.
    2. Akande, D and Shah, Sangeeta., " Immunities of State Officials, International Crimes, and Foreign Domestic Courts", The European Journal of International Law. Vol. 21, No. 4, 2011, pp. 815–852
    3. Bassiouni, M. C., Universal Jurisdiction for International Crimes: Historical Perspectives and Contemporary Practice, Virginia Journal of International Law, Vol. 42, Issue 1, 2002, pp. 81-162.
    4. Bian Chi A., “Immunity Versus Human Right: The Pinochet Case”, I Int'l L, No. 10, 1999, pp. 237-245.
    5. Buzzini, Gionata P., “Lights and Shadows of Immunities and Inviolability of State Officials in International law: Some Comments on Djibouti V. France Case”, Cambridge University Press, 2009, pp. 455-438.
    6. Cassese, A., “When May Senior State Officials Be Tried for International Crimes?”, EJIL, Vol 13, No4, 2002, pp. 853-875.
    7. Frulli, M., "The Question of Charles Taylor's Immunity. Still in Search of a Balanced Application of Personal Immunities?", .Int '.l.CRIM, 2004, pp. 1118-1125.
    8. Huang, H., “Editorial Comment on Immunity of State Officials from Foreign Criminal Jurisdiction”, Chinese Journal of International law, Vol. 13, Issue. 1, 2014, pp. 1-11.
    9. Kolodkin, R. A., “Preliminary Report on Immunity of State Officials from Foreign Criminal Jurisdiction”, UN A/CN.4/601, 2008.
    10. Schimmelpenninck van der Oije & Pita J.C, " A Surinam Crime Before a Dutch Court: Post-Colonial Injustice or Universal Jurisdiction?", Leiden Journal of International Law, Vol. 14, 2001, pp. 455–476.
    11. Spinedi, M., “State Responsibility V. International Responsibility for International Crime, Tertium non Datur”, EJIL, Vol.13, No.4, 2002, pp. 895- 899.
    12. Wirth, S., “ Immunity for Core Crimes? The ICJ's Judgment in the Congo v. Belgium case”, EJIL, Vol. 13, 2002, pp. 877-983.
    13. Zappala, S., “Do Heads of State in Office Enjoy Immunity from Jurisdiction for International Crimes? The Ghaddafi Case before the French Cour de Cassation”, EJIL. Vol. 12, No. 3, 2001, pp. 595-612.

     

     

    1. Documents

     

     

    1. Arrest Warrant of (11 April 2002), (Congo V. Belgium, 41 LM) 536
    2. Basic Principles of International Law Concerning the Protection of the Officials of Foreign States, Paper Delivered at the Thirty-first Annual Convention of the International Study Association in Washington, D.C., on (11 April 1990).
    3. Canada Ontario Court of Appeal (1993). Miller, Jaffe V and Others, 95 ILR 446
    4. Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment Art, 4, Dec. 10. 1984, 1465u.N.T.S. 85.
    5. Former Syrian Ambassador to the German Democratic Republic case, Case No. 2 BvR 1516/96 (1997), 115 ILR 595, at 609–610, 613–614 (Germany: Federal Constitutional Ct).
    6. International Law Commission Sixtieth Session Geneva, 5 May-6 June and 7 July-8 August 2008, A/CN.4/601
    7. Judgment of 1 October 1946, in The Trial of German Major War Criminals. Proceedings of the International Military Tribunal sitting at Nuremberg, Germany, Part 22 (22nd August ,1946 to 1st October, 1946
    8. The Prosecutor v. Climent Kayishema and Obed Ruzindana Case International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda Tribunal Penal International Pour le Rwanda, No. ICTR-95, 1 June 2001.
    9. Report of the International Law Commission, Fifty-Third Session, A/56/10, Extract from the Yearbook of the International Law Commission (2001). Vol. II.
    10. Report of the International Law Commission, Sixty-fifth session, A/68/10, (2013)
    11. Report of the International Law Commission, Sixty-sixth session, A/69/10, (2014)
    12. Report of the International Law Commission, Sixty- eighth session, A/CN.4/701, (2016)
    13. Report of International Law Commission, Sixty-Ninth Session, A/CN.4/L.893, (2017).
    14. Report of the International Law Commission to the General Assembly on the Work of Sixty-Seventh Session, A/70/10. GE.15 (4 May-5 June and 6 July-7 August 2015).
    15. Int’l Common Law, Report on the Work of Its Sixty-Ninth Session, UN Doc. A/72/10 (sept. 11, 2017).
    16. Report of the International Law Commission, Seventy- eighth session, A/74/10, (2019).
    17. R v. Hi Bow Street Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate, Ex Parte Pinochet Ugarte (No 3), House of Lords, 2000

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

Legal Research Quarterly
Volume 24, Issue 95 - Serial Number 95
November 2021
Pages 183-208

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 04 April 2021
  • Revise Date: 13 August 2021
  • Accept Date: 22 September 2021

Share

How to cite

Statistics