تحلیل حقوقی جنبه های ثبوتی و اثباتی انتساب داده پیام در قانون تجارت الکترونیک ایران

الف) منابع فارسی
کتاب
1 .دهخدا، علی اکبر، لغت نامه اینترنتی دهخدا.
2 .جعفری لنگرودی، محمد جعفر، دانش نامه حقـوقی، موسسـه انتشـارات امیرکبیـر، چـاپ
پنجم، 1375 .
3 .جعفری لنگرودی، محمدجعفر، دوره پنج جلدی مبسوط در ترمینولوژی حقوق، جلد 1،
گنج دانش.
4 .معین، محمد، فرهنگ آنلاین معین.
ب) منابع انگلیسی
Books
5. Lance, Rose, Netlaw: Your Rights in the Online World, Osborne Mc
Graw-Hill, 1995.
6. National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws, Uniform
Electronic Transactions Act (1999), (UETA), Drafted by the National
Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws (with Prefatory
Note and Comments), 1999.
7. Savin, Andrej, EU Internet Law, Elgar European law, Edward Elgar Pub.,
2013.
8. Schellekens, M. H. M., Electronic Signatures: Authentication Technology
from a Legal Perspective,TMC Asser Press, The Hague The Netherlands,
2004.
9. United Nations, United Nations Commission on International Trade Law,
Promoting Confidence in Electronic Commerce: Legal Issues on
International Use of Electronic Authentication and Signature Methods,
United Nations, Vienna, 2009.
10. United Nations, United Nations Uncitral Model Law on Electronic
Commerce, Guide to Enactment 1996 with additional article 5 as adopted
in 1998, United Nations, New York, 2002. 
فصلنامه تحقیقات حقوقی شماره 93 تحلیل حقوقی جنبههای ثبوتی و اثباتی انتساب داده پیام...
190
11. United Nations, Uncitral Model Law on Electronic Signature with Guide
to Enactment 2001, United Nations, New York, 2002.
12. Warwick Ford, Computer Communications Security: Principles, Standard
Protocols and Techniques,Prentice Hall, Englwood Cliffs, NJ, 1994.
13. Yun, Zhao, Dispute Resolution in Electronic Commerce, Martinus
Nijhoff Publishers, 2005.
Articles
14. Agris, Repss and Ilze Znotina, “Electronic Evidence in Latvia”, Digital
Evidence and Electronic Signature Law Review, Volume 8, 2100.
15. Anjanette, H., Raymond & J Benjamin Lambert,“Technology, Ecommerce and the Emerging Harmonization: The Growing Body of
International InstrumentsFacilitating Ecommerce and the Continuing
Need to Encourage Wide Adoption”, International Trade andBusiness
Law Review, Volume 17, 2014.
16. Boss, Amelia, H., “Searching for Security in the Law of Electronic
Commerce”, Nova Law Review, Volume 23, Issue 2, 1999.
17.Froomkin, A., Michael, “The Essential Role of Trusted Third Parties in
Electronic Commerce”, Oregon Law Review, Vol. 75, 1996.
18. Mikellyn, Jason, Johnson, Charles, Transactions of the Centre for
Business Law, Consequences of and Problems with Electronic Contracts,
University of the Free State, Chapter 8, Issue 37, 2005.
19. Mann, Ronald J., Warren, Elizabeth: Westbrook, Jay
Lawrence, Comprehensive Commercial Law 2018: Statutory Supplement
(Supplements) Paperback, 2018, Wolters Kluwer.
20. Manuel, Alba, “Order out of Chaos: Technology, Intermediation, Trust,
and Reliability as the Basis for the Recognition of Legal Effects in
Electronic transactions”, Creighton Law Review, Volume 47, 2014.
21. Phang, A., & Seng, D., “The Singapore Electronic Transactions Act
1998 and the Proposed Article 2B of the Uniform Commercial
Code”,International Journal of Law and Information Technology,
Volume 7, 1999.
22. Pistorius, Tana, “Nobody Knows You're a Dog: The Attribution of Data
Messages”, South African Mercantile Law Journal, 2002, Volume 14.
23. Tan, Bryan (Singapore correspondent), “Case Note”, Digital Evidence
and Electronic Signature Law Review, 2005, at 114-15. Available at: 
فصلنامه تحقیقات حقوقی شماره 93 تحلیل حقوقی جنبههای ثبوتی و اثباتی انتساب داده پیام...
 191
file:///C:/Users/dear/Downloads/1763-Article%20Text-2391-1-10-
20140120.pdf
24. Yaman Akdeniz& Others, “Cryptography and Liberty: 'Can the Trusted
Third Parties Be Trusted? A Critique of the Recent UK Proposals”,
Journal of Information Technology, Vol. 2, 1997.
Cases
25. Central Illinois Light Company (CILCO) v. Consolidation Coal Company
(Consol), United States District Court for the Central District of Illinois, 30
December 2002, Federal Supplement, 2nd series, vol. 235, p. 916.
26. Chwee Kin Keong & Others v. Digilandmall.com Pte Ltd [2005] SGCA
2 (A/CN.9/SER.C/ABSTRACTS/50 II; Decision date13/01/2005; United
Nations, United Nations Commission on International Trade Law, Case
Law on UNCITRAL Texts (CLOUT)).
27. Commonwealth Aluminum Corporation v. Stanley Metal Associates,
United States District Court for the Western District of Kentucky, 9
August 2001, Federal Supplement, 2nd series, vol. 186, p. 770.
28. Dickens v. State, 927 A.2d 32, 36-37 (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 2007).
29. Lorraine v. Markel Am. Ins. Co., 241 F.R.D. 534, 554 (D. Md. 2007).
30. People v. Brown, A122791, 2009 WL 1878704, at *3 (Cal. Ct. App. June
30, 2009).
31. Sea-Land Service, Inc. v. Lozen International, LLC, United States Court
of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 3 April 2002, Federal Reporter, 3rd
series, vol. 285, p. 808.
32. State v. Taylor, 632 S.E.2d 218, 230 (N.C. Ct. App. 2006).
33. Superhighway Consulting, Inc. v. Techwave, Inc., United States District
Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, 16 November
1999, U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17910.
34. Talada v. City of Martinez, 656 F. Supp. 2d 1147, 1158 (N.D. Cal.
2009).
35. United States v. Safavian, 435 F. Supp. 2d 36, 40 (D.D.C. 2006).
Acts
36. Singapore‘s Electronic Transaction Act Revised 2011.
37. Australian Electronic Transactions Act 1999.
38. Uniform Electronic Transactions Act (UETA), Drafted by the USA
National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws,(1999).