نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 استاد دانشگاه علوم قضایی و خدمات اداری(نویسنده مسئول)
2 دانشجوی دکتری حقوق خصوصی، دانشگاه مازندران
3 استاد دانشکده حقوق، دانشگاه مازندران
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
The Independence and Impartiality of Arbitrator in International Arbitration with Emphasis on Judicial Judgments
1.Homayoun Mafi 2.Behzad Ghavami 3. Sam Mohammadi 3
Professor of Law, University of Judicial Sciences and Administrative Services.
Ph.D Candidate, Private Law, University of Mazandaran.
Professor of Law, University of Mazandaran.
Abstract
The purpose of arbitration is to resolve a dispute and this brings the arbitration closer to the judiciary, then it creates the impression that, the arbitrator must also be subject to the same conditions as are necessary for the judge. The arbitrator's independence and impartiality derive from his obligations to the parties to settle disputes. These are qualities that are essential to a judge but are optional for the arbitration body, that is, arbitrator or arbitrators appointed by the parties to the dispute. Even if, this feature does not conflict with the “judgmental" feature of arbitration, and the requisiteness of having the character of a judge by the arbitrator, was not called into question, at the very least, it casts doubt on the necessity of the arbitrator's independence and impartiality. Because, generally, the parties to the dispute select persons for arbitration that somehow related to them. This is more evident in three-person judgments. Because in this type of arbitration, essentially, the parties to the dispute have the full discretion to choose their own arbitrator and usually, they look for a judgment that has the most affinity, relevance and affiliation with them. This article by separating the concepts of independence and impartiality, will review and analyze the prevailing approach in international arbitration.
Key words: Arbitrator, Arbitration panel, Independence, Impartiality, Single arbitrator
کلیدواژهها [English]
منابع
1-فارسی
الف) کتب
1-امیر معزی، احمد،داوری بین المللی در دعاوی بازرگانی. تهران: انتشارات دادگستر،چاپ اول ، 1387،ص211.
2-اشمیتوف،کلایو ام ،حقوق تجارت بین الملل،تهران: جلد دوم،ترجمه بهروز اخلاقی و دیگران:انتشارات سمت،چاپ اول ،13787،ص994.
3-جنیدی، لعیا، اجرای آرای داوری بازرگانی خارجی ،تهران:موسسه مطالعات و پژوهش های حقوقی، چاپ اول، 1381،صص261-267.
4-جنیدی،لعیا، نقد و بررسی تطبیقی قانون داوری تجاری بین المللی ، تهران :انتشارات دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی دانشگاه تهران با همکاری موسسه حقوق تطبیقی دانشگاه تهران، چاپ اول، بهار1378،ص59.
5- لیو، جولیان دی ام و لوکاس ای میستلیس، و استفان ام کرول ، داوری تجاری بین المللی تطبیقی، تهران: ترجمه محمد حبیبی مجنده،:انتشارات دانشگاه مفید، چاپ اول، پاییز، 1391،صص273-280
6-فاطمی،احمد،علی گل تبار ،محسن،نظام داوری در حل و فصل اختلافات تجاری بین المللی،تهران:انتشارات جنگل ، چاپ اول ،1397،ص175
7-مافی،همایون،شرحی بر قانون داوری تجاری بین المللی ایران ،تهران:انتشارات دانشگاه علوم قضایی،چاپ دوم،1397،صص170-174.
ب)مقالات
8-السان، مصطفی، ایلدار اقا قلیزاده خیاوی ،داوری جانبدارانه و تقابل آن با اصول بنیادیین حاکم بر داوری. فصلنامه را هبرد،1393،شماره 70،ص1-6.
9 -تاپ من،مایکل، جرح و سلب صلاحیت از داوران در داوری تجاری بین المللی، ترجمه محمد جواد میرفخرایی، مجله حقوقی دفتر خدمات حقوقی بین المللی ،1369، شماره 12، ص172.
10-حیدری،سیروس،اصل تناظردر حقوق فرانسه و کامن لو، تهران:مجله مطالعات حقوقی،سال دوم،بهر و تابستان 1389، شماره1،ص127.
2-لاتین
l- Books
11.Born,GB. International Commercial Arbitration, The Netherlands: Kluwer Law International, Vol. II, 2014 .
12.Fuchard, PH. Gaillard, E& Goldman, B. Traite de L'arbitrage Commercial International, Paris: Litec, 1996.
ll- Articles
14.Bernasconi.N.& Johnson. L& Marshal. F," Arbitrator Independence and Impartiality: Examining the Dual Role of Arbitrator and Counsel", New Delhi: IV Annual Forum for Developing Country Investment Negotiators, 27-29 October( 2010):17-21.
15.Bastida.B.M."The Independence and Impartiality oF Arbitrators IN International Commercial Arbitration", Mercatoria Vol. 6, No. 1.(2007):1-7 .
17.Franck. S. D." The Liability of International Arbitrators: A Comparative Analysis and Proposal for Qualified Immunity";New York Law School Journal of International and Comparative Law.Vol20.No.1(2000):4 .
18.Gélinas.F." The Independence of International Arbitrators and Judges: Tampered With or Well Tempered?",New York International Law Review, Vol. 24. No. 1.( 2011: ( 27-38.
19.Griffith, Gavan, Q.C.,“Constitution of Arbitral Tribunals: The Duty of Impartiality in Tribunals or Choose Your Arbitrator Wisely”, ICSID Review-Foreign Investment Law Journal, Vol. 13(1), (1998( :39-49.
20.Hascher.J.D." Independence and Impartiality of Arbitrators", AM. U. INT’L L. REV. V.24,N4.(2012):789-801.
21.Henry, M." Le Devoir d'independence de l'arbitre", Paris:, L.G.D.J ( 2001):167-333.
22.IBA Subcommittee on Recognition and Enforcement of Arbitral Awards,October( 2015):15.
23.Lawson,D"Impartiality and Independence of Arbitrators", ASA Bulletin.Vol.23 (.2005):22 -44.
24.Liberman, S.H. "Something's Rotten in the State of Party-Appointed Arbitration", Healing Adres Black Free Thatis "Nonneutral Neutrals"(2004): 221,Available at :http://cardozojcr.com/vol5no2/CAC209.pdf.last.
25.ManasijericوT" Austrian Supreme Court on the Lack of Impartiality and Independence of Arbitrators Ex Post",March 12(2020):1,available http://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2020/03/12/austrian-supreme-court-on-the-lack-of-impartiality-and-independence-of-arbitrators-discovered-ex-post.
26.Nathan. K V S K. "The Independence of Arbitrators", Amicus Curiae,Issue 68,November/December( 2006):18-21.
27.Redish, M.& B. Lawrence& C. Varshal," Adjudicatory Independence and the Values of Procedural Due Process", Yale.L.J.455 (2001):12.
28.Smit,.H."Quo Vadis Arbitration? Sixty Years of Arbitration Practice by Pieter Sanders,American", Review of International Arbitration,V.2(2000):429.
Thesis:
31.Steenkamp,T."Independence And Impartiality of Arbitrators,Dissertation Submitted in Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree Magister Legum at the North-West. University (Potchefstroom Campus),2007:60-76.
)